Seeing if something is Dimensionally correct.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sirsh
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying the dimensional correctness of the terminal velocity equation Vt = (2mg/pA)1/2. Participants analyze the units involved, noting that mass (kg) cancels out during simplification, leading to confusion about the presence of the constant "2." It is clarified that dimensional analysis primarily checks units, and coefficients like "2" do not affect dimensional correctness. The conclusion reached is that the equation is not dimensionally correct as presented, prompting further exploration of the calculations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly handling units in dimensional analysis.
Sirsh
Messages
262
Reaction score
10
Vt = (2mg/pA)1/2

where:
Vt = Terminal Velocity (ms-1) as velocity = s/t = m/s(seconds, not distance).
m = mass in kg.
g = gravity in ms-2.
p = fluid density in kgm-3
A = Area in m2

Show that equation is dimesionally correct.

I seem to get my answer wrong on the end product; ill show my working up too where I've got my answer incorrect.

Vt = (2mg/pA)1/2

m/s = (2(kg)(m/s2)/(kg/m3)(m2))1/2

(m/s)2 = (2(kg)(m/s2)/(kg/m3)(m2))

(m/s)2 = (2(kg)(m4)/((kg)(s2)(m2))

(m2/s2) = ((kg)(m2))/(s2)

As you can see the equation is quite simplified at this point, with the only problem being that both left and right sides do not equal, which shows that the equation is not dimensionally correct, i am unsure though how to get rid of this unit of kg in my equation though. can anyone help me out on this one, thanks alot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why didn't you cancel out the kilograms at any point? From the get go, it cancels out.
 
If i cancle the kg out, then i am stuck with a '2' in the final equation instead of a kg unit. because if i try cancle the 2 out by halving that side, then the other side (left hand side) gets 2 in the denominator :/
 
I'm not completely sure about this, but does the "2" even matter in dimensional analysis? I believe dimensional analysis is just to check the units. The coefficient isn't involved or checked.
 
Good point! ill check that up!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top