Seeing if something is Dimensionally correct.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sirsh
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying the dimensional correctness of the terminal velocity equation Vt = (2mg/pA)1/2. Participants analyze the units involved, noting that mass (kg) cancels out during simplification, leading to confusion about the presence of the constant "2." It is clarified that dimensional analysis primarily checks units, and coefficients like "2" do not affect dimensional correctness. The conclusion reached is that the equation is not dimensionally correct as presented, prompting further exploration of the calculations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly handling units in dimensional analysis.
Sirsh
Messages
262
Reaction score
10
Vt = (2mg/pA)1/2

where:
Vt = Terminal Velocity (ms-1) as velocity = s/t = m/s(seconds, not distance).
m = mass in kg.
g = gravity in ms-2.
p = fluid density in kgm-3
A = Area in m2

Show that equation is dimesionally correct.

I seem to get my answer wrong on the end product; ill show my working up too where I've got my answer incorrect.

Vt = (2mg/pA)1/2

m/s = (2(kg)(m/s2)/(kg/m3)(m2))1/2

(m/s)2 = (2(kg)(m/s2)/(kg/m3)(m2))

(m/s)2 = (2(kg)(m4)/((kg)(s2)(m2))

(m2/s2) = ((kg)(m2))/(s2)

As you can see the equation is quite simplified at this point, with the only problem being that both left and right sides do not equal, which shows that the equation is not dimensionally correct, i am unsure though how to get rid of this unit of kg in my equation though. can anyone help me out on this one, thanks alot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why didn't you cancel out the kilograms at any point? From the get go, it cancels out.
 
If i cancle the kg out, then i am stuck with a '2' in the final equation instead of a kg unit. because if i try cancle the 2 out by halving that side, then the other side (left hand side) gets 2 in the denominator :/
 
I'm not completely sure about this, but does the "2" even matter in dimensional analysis? I believe dimensional analysis is just to check the units. The coefficient isn't involved or checked.
 
Good point! ill check that up!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top