Seemingly Simple - How Many Orbits? (Rotational Kinematics)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the number of orbits an electron makes around a proton in a hydrogen atom based on the Bohr model. The user correctly determined the angular velocity of the electron as 5.15e15 rad/s but incorrectly converted this to revolutions per second as 8.09e15 rev/s. A participant points out that it is impossible to have more full revolutions than radians in the same time frame, indicating a flaw in the conversion process. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate unit conversion in rotational kinematics. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving similar physics problems effectively.
kmj9k
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
This is the latest question I've been stuck on.

The Bohr model of the hydrogen atom pictures the electron as a tiny particle moving in a circular orbit about a stationary proton. In the n=2 orbit, the distance from the proton to the electron is 21.16e-11 m , and the linear speed of the electron is 1.09e6 m/s.

How many orbits about the proton does it make each second?

Now, I found the angular velocity of the electron and got that correct: 5.15e15 rad/s. Now, to find the # of orbits, shouldn't I just convert to revolutions per second, which is 8.09e15 rev/s? The computer tells me I'm wrong, however, but I don't know what I could do differently.

Again, I appreciate your time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kmj9k said:
This is the latest question I've been stuck on.

The Bohr model of the hydrogen atom pictures the electron as a tiny particle moving in a circular orbit about a stationary proton. In the n=2 orbit, the distance from the proton to the electron is 21.16e-11 m , and the linear speed of the electron is 1.09e6 m/s.

How many orbits about the proton does it make each second?

Now, I found the angular velocity of the electron and got that correct: 5.15e15 rad/s. Now, to find the # of orbits, shouldn't I just convert to revolutions per second, which is 8.09e15 rev/s? The computer tells me I'm wrong, however, but I don't know what I could do differently.

Again, I appreciate your time!
I promise you that it is impossible to do more full revolutions than radians in the same amount of time. Your angular velocity looks good; your conversion does not.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top