Separating a hamiltonian into C.O.M and relative hamiltonians

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on separating the two-body Hamiltonian into center of mass and relative Hamiltonians. Participants emphasize the importance of defining the center of mass vector R and the relative vector r, which leads to expressing positions and momenta in terms of these new variables. The conversation highlights that the translational energy associated with the center of mass can be neglected when focusing on the relative motion. There is also a reminder that the vectors involved are crucial for accurate calculations. The overall goal is to rewrite the Hamiltonian using R and r to simplify the problem.
richyw
Messages
179
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the two-body hamiltonianH_{\text{sys}}=\frac{\mathbf{p}_1^2}{2m_1}+\frac{\mathbf{p}_2^2}{2m_2}+V( \mathbf{r}_1,\mathbf{r}_2)can be separated into centre of mass and relative hamiltoniansH_{\text{sys}}=\frac{\mathbf{P}^2}{2M}+\frac{\mathbf{p}_{\text{rel}}}{2\mu}+V(r)Do this in two ways:

a)with momentum operators in abstract
b)momentum operators in the position representation

Homework Equations


I'm assuming this one, the text does not actually say
M=m_1+m_2mu=\frac{m_1m_2}{m_1+m_2}\mathbf{P}=\mathbf{p}_1+\mathbf{p}_2\mathbf{p}_{\text{rel}}=\frac{m_1\mathbf{p}_2-m_2\mathbf{p}_1}{m_1+m_2}

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried to do this by plugging the definitions into the equations. tried working backwards too. not really sure where to start here!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can write r_2-r_1=r and R=\frac{m_1r_1+m_2r_2}{m1 + m2}.

Using these, you can solve for r_1 and r_2 in terms of R and r. Then, obviously, you can find momentum or the two objects in terms of R and r.

It is important to remember that R is the center of mass. If you end up with a term that says \frac{1}{2}(m_1+m_2)\dot{R}^2 then you can say "Not interested in translational energy of the entire system, thus, this term can be neglected.. Etc etc. Use your imagination :)

Lastly, don't forget that these r's are vectors. I'm not sure how much of a difference it will make in your math, but it's still an important point.
 
sorry. I am already lost. how can I obviously find the momentum in terms of r and R?
 
richyw said:
sorry. I am already lost. how can I obviously find the momentum in terms of r and R?

My apologies, I assumed that if you are studying Hamiltonian mechanics you would understand what I was saying.

Let me reiterate:
From my example above r is the vector that points from mass 1 to mass 2. Also R is the vector that points to the center of mass from the origin.

Using those two definitions, you can solve for r_1 in terms of R and r. Meaning that you can get r_1=... where the only thing on the right would be R's, r's, and masses. No r_1's or r_2's.

Total momentum is mass times velocity. Therefore, p_1=m_1v_1=m_1\dot{r}_1 where \dot{r}_1 is the derivative of r_1 with respect to time, AKA, the velocity of mass 1.

Anyways, the problem is asking you to rewrite the Hamiltonian in terms of R's and r's. Since you know what p_1 is and you know r_1 in terms of R's and r's, you can find momentum in terms of R's and r's. The same can be said for p_2. Thus, the problem is pretty much solved.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top