Separation of Isotopes by Laser Excitation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the viability of laser isotope separation technology, specifically Atomic Vapor Laser Isotope Separation (AVLIS), developed in the 1970s at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. AVLIS utilizes precise tunable lasers to ionize U-235 while leaving U-238 unaffected, allowing for efficient separation. The technology's potential to reduce nuclear power costs is highlighted, alongside its historical context and the transition of uranium enrichment from government to private sector management. The conversation also touches on the nuances of ionization potentials and absorption wavelengths for U-235 and U-238. Overall, AVLIS represents a significant advancement in nuclear fuel enrichment technology.
Engineering news on Phys.org
kaos said:
kaos,

Actually this technology was developed in the early '70s at Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory:

http://www.llnl.gov/50th_anniv/decades/1970s.htm

[Scroll down to the entry for the year 1973 ]

The process is called AVLIS - Atomic Vapor Laser Isotope Separation.

Here's how it works. The equations of Quantum Mechanics that describe how
electrons "orbit" atoms contains in one of its terms the mass of the electron.
However, since the electron orbits a nucleus of finite mass; this is a "two-body"
problem - and one has to use the so-called "reduced mass" of the electron -
m = m*M / (m + M) where "m" is the electron mass, and "M" is the mass of the
nucleus.

Therefore, the mass of the nucleus "M" enters into the equations that define the
orbits of the electrons. When you do the calculations, you will find that the
"ionization potential" - that is the amount of energy you have to add to the outermost
electron to kick it free and form a charged ion - is very slightly less for U-235 than it
is for U-238.

You then need a VERY precise tunable laser. LLNL developed a tunable dye laser
pumped by copper vapor lasers. You tune the laser to a frequency so that the laser
photons have enough energy to ionize U-235; but not enough energy to ionize U-238.

You send this laser zig-zagging through a chamber of UF6 gas or vaporized U and
the laser will ionize the U-235, but not the U-238. The U-235 can then be deflected
electrostatically by a charged plate into a separate stream from the U-238.

To learn more about AVLIS, tunable laser applications, and a spin-off from this
work called the "laser guide star" - a powerful new tool for astronomers first deployed
on the 3m Shane telescope at Lick Observatory - but now in use at largest telescopes
in the world - the Keck telescopes on Mauna Kea in Hawaii; see:

www.llnl.gov/str/pdfs/05_00.2.pdf

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Morbius said:
When you do the calculations, you will find that the
"ionization potential" - that is the amount of energy you have to add to the outermost
electron to kick it free and form a charged ion - is very slightly less for U-235 than it
is for U-238.

I have a figure in one of my texts that shows that light of a lower wavelength is used for U-235. Does this not correspond to a higher energy for ionization for U-235 than for U-238?
 
theCandyman said:
I have a figure in one of my texts that shows that light of a lower wavelength is used for U-235. Does this not correspond to a higher energy for ionization for U-235 than for U-238?
Candyman,

You may be correct. I forget whether U-235 absorbs at a lower frequency - in which
case it has a lower ionization potential; or at a lower wavelength [ higher frequency ],
in which case it has a higher ionization potential.

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
theCandyman said:
I have a figure in one of my texts that shows that light of a lower wavelength is used for U-235. Does this not correspond to a higher energy for ionization for U-235 than for U-238?
The 'shorter' wavelength corresponds to a slightly higher ionization energy, but not by much.

According to Wikipedia - The absorption lines of 235U and 238U differ slightly; for example, the 238[/sup]U absorption peak shifts from 5027.4 Angstroms to 5027.3 Angstroms in 235U.

According to the UWisc NE notes, the wavelength used to ionized U-235 is 5915 Å, so I'll have to find other references to clarify.

Some discussion here - http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep423/FALL99/lecture8.pdf

Contrary to what other sources say, USEC took over ALVIS from LLNL then abandoned it.

USEC to Go Private

President Clinton has approved proceeding with the privatization of the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC). USEC manages the Laboratory's Atomic Vapor Laser Isotope Separation (AVLIS) project, which is intended to produce enriched uranium for commercial nuclear reactor fuel. USEC was created in 1992 by Congress to privatize federal uranium enrichment activities, which convert natural uranium to enriched uranium for reactor fuel. With Clinton's approval, USEC will now be moved to the private sector.

"The vision . . . is to move uranium enrichment out of the government and into the private sector while realizing a substantial return for the U.S. taxpayer," said USEC Chairman William J. Rainer. "This latest action moves us to the final stages of realizing that vision." The action also furthers the nation's largest technology transfer effort.

USEC officials estimate it will take approximately six months to convert to private ownership. Added Victor Lopiano, director of the AVLIS program at Livermore, "This is an important first step toward AVLIS deployment."
ref: http://www.llnl.gov/str/News1097.html

http://www.usec.com/v2001_02/Content/News/NewsTemplate.asp?page=/v2001_02/Content/News/Speeches/09-07-00.htm

Other interesting data - Table of Ionization Energies (eV) of Atoms and Ions -
http://www.astro.lsa.umich.edu/~cowley/ionen.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top