Sequence of projection is Cauchy

yifli
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let {M_i} be an orthogonal sequence of complete subspaces of a pre-Hilbert space V, and let P_i be the orthogonal projection on M_i. Prove that {P_i(e)} is Cauchy for any e in V


2. The attempt at a solution
I'm trying to prove as n and m goes infinity, \left\|P_n(e)-P_m(e)\right\|^2\rightarrow 0

Here is what I've got so far:
\left\|P_n(e)-P_m(e)\right\|^2=\left\|P_n(e)\right\|^2+\left\|P_m(e)\right\|^2 because P_n(e) is orthogonal to P_m(e), how to proceed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi yifli! :smile:

First, we can take V to be a Hilbert space. Indeed, try to prove this by taking the completion of V.

Second, try to do something with \sum_{i=1}^{+\infty}{P_i(e)}?
 
micromass said:
Second, try to do something with \sum_{i=1}^{+\infty}{P_i(e)}?

I did try that:
P_n(e)=e-\sum_{i=1,i \neq n}^{+\infty}{P_i(e)}.

substituting the above formula into \left\|P_n(e)-P_m(e)\right\| gives me the same thing

What did I miss?
 
yifli said:
I did try that:
P_n(e)=e-\sum_{i=1,i \neq n}^{+\infty}{P_i(e)}.

Firstly, This formula doesn't hold.
Secondly, my point was that \sum_{i=1}^{+\infty}{P_i(e)} converges. Thus...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top