Sequences in Complex Plane which Converge Absolutely

Poopsilon
Messages
288
Reaction score
1
Let A be a non-empty subset of the complex plane and let b ∈ ℂ be an arbitrary point not in A. Now define d(A,b) := inf{|z-b| : z ∈ A}. Show that if A is closed, then there is an a ∈ A such that d(A,b) = |a-b|.

Ok so basically what I did was begin by choosing some arbitrary element of A and labeling it z_1 and then set |z_1 - b|=x_1. Then I defined a rule such that we find some other element in A, z_2, such that |z_2 - b|=x_2 < x_1. So in this way we have defined a sequence of real numbers which is always positive, decreasing, and bounded below by zero, hence it converges to some real number call it x. Now there is a plurality of z ∈ ℂ such that |z-b| = x, the difficult part for me is showing that one of these z is in A.

I mean I can see that the sequence (z_n) need not converge, since it may simply continue bouncing around a circle of radius x in the complex plane. What I originally wanted to use to prove that there is a z ∈ A such that |z-b|=x was that convergent sequences in closed sets converge to limits within that set. But since (z_n) need not necessarily converge for (x_n) to converge, that puts a damper on things. I was thinking of maybe finding a subsequence which converges, or assuming by contradiction that if none of the z such that |z-b|=x are in A than that would cause (x_n) not to converge, but I can't find a way to set that up properly either.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Say you call K = {z: |z - b| ≤ 1}. Then K\cap A is compact and you can get your sequence in there...
 
Say you call K = {z: |z - b| ≤ 1}. Then K∩A is compact and you can get your sequence in there...

I'm sorry but this is simply too terse and cryptic for me to comprehend. The distance from the closest point in A to b is unknown so your intersection of K and A may be empty. Are you describing a way to find a convergent subsequence? I just really can't tell, please elaborate.
 
Poopsilon said:
I'm sorry but this is simply too terse and cryptic for me to comprehend. The distance from the closest point in A to b is unknown so your intersection of K and A may be empty. Are you describing a way to find a convergent subsequence? I just really can't tell, please elaborate.

Saying K = {z: |z - b| ≤ 1} is probably not what LCKurtz meant to write. How about K = {z: |z - b| ≤ 2*d(A,b)}? You know how having a compact set would solve your 'points bouncing around' problem, yes?
 
Dick said:
Saying K = {z: |z - b| ≤ 1} is probably not what LCKurtz meant to write. How about K = {z: |z - b| ≤ 2*d(A,b)}? You know how having a compact set would solve your 'points bouncing around' problem, yes?

Yes, careless slip there. Thanks Dick.
 
Ah, yes, excellent, thanks.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top