Calculus Serge Lang vs Larson & Edwards (Calculus)

AI Thread Summary
For those seeking a deeper understanding of Calculus, the discussion highlights the merits of various textbooks. Lang's text is noted for its positive reputation, while Larson and Edwards are currently being used by one participant. Apostol and Spivak are recommended as strong choices for those comfortable with mathematical terminology, with Spivak being slightly more accessible due to its connections to real analysis. Apostol is described as methodical but dry, with a second volume for multivariable calculus. It is suggested that these books are better suited for readers who already have a solid foundation in calculus. Additionally, "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences" by Baos is mentioned as a suitable option for science students. Participants emphasize the importance of sampling various texts to find one that resonates personally, as this can significantly enhance the learning experience.
Cosmophile
Messages
111
Reaction score
2
I have a copy of both Lang's text and Larson and Edwards' text, and was wondering which would be best for someone looking for a deeper understanding of Calculus. Any and all advice is welcome here! I was working through Kleppner & Kolenkow's Introduction to Mechanics and decided I need a much more thorough understanding of Calculus if I was to get the full effect. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've heard good things about Lang's book, but never used it myself. What calculus book(s) have you completed so far? If you have access to a library, you may want to try Apostol or Spivak, both are very strong choices, if you're not pushed away by math lingo. Spivak is easier in terms of dryness; connects a lot with real analysis. Apostol is very methodical, although kind of dry. Apostol has 2nd tome for multivar, Spivak has Calculus on Manifolds. From there on you can go to Rudin. Either way, I suggest to sample as many as you can and find one which talks to you; it will help a great deal.
 
Just remembered, there is also Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences by Baos, for the science audience.
 
I've heard of both Apostol and Spivak, but have been told that they are books you should go to AFTER you've established a pretty strong foundation - not books you go to to establish that foundation. I haven't "completed" a textbook yet; what I've learned, I've learned from several sources. Mostly from my Larson/Edwards text and MIT videos. I'm enjoying Lang so far, though!
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
Back
Top