Set R^(2) with the usual vector addition forms an abelian group

ak123456
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


the set R^(2) with the usual vector addition forms an abelian group. For a belongs to R and x=(x1,x2) belongs to R^(2) we put a *x :=(ax1,0),this defines a scalar multiplication R*R^2 ---R^2 (a,x)---a*x.
determine which of the axioms defining a vector space hold for the abelian group R^2 with the scalar multiplication


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know that a*x1=ax1 but a*x2=0?? It confused me . And how to use an axiom to define it ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


ak123456 said:

Homework Statement


the set R^(2) with the usual vector addition forms an abelian group. For a belongs to R and x=(x1,x2) belongs to R^(2) we put a *x :=(ax1,0),this defines a scalar multiplication R*R^2 ---R^2 (a,x)---a*x.
determine which of the axioms defining a vector space hold for the abelian group R^2 with the scalar multiplication


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know that a*x1=ax1 but a*x2=0?? It confused me . And how to use an axiom to define it ?
You don't "use an axiom to define it"- it is already defined. And "a*x1" doesn't mean anything- a*(x1, x2) is defined as (ax1, 0). You need to show that this still obeys the axioms defining a vector space. What are those axioms?
 


HallsofIvy said:
You don't "use an axiom to define it"- it is already defined. And "a*x1" doesn't mean anything- a*(x1, x2) is defined as (ax1, 0). You need to show that this still obeys the axioms defining a vector space. What are those axioms?

oh,i see . i have to use ax1 and 0 to show 1st and 2nd distributivity law,identity elements and the compatibility are all exist ?
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top