- #1

- 219

- 0

so to reword the problem i instead want to show that given G-K is open in G and K-F is open in K show that G-F is open in G. so since G is a topological space and K is a subspace of G, i endow K with the subspace topology. then there exists some open set O in G such that any open subset of K such as K-F = O ∩ K. then F = K - (O∩K) then i drew myself a picture and found that F also equals (G-O)∩K which works because G-F = G-(G-O) ∪ (G-K) = O U (G-K) and since O is open in G and (G-K) is open in G therefore the union of those 2 sets is also open in G and G-F is then open in G which means F is closed in G.

i wish to know that in these types of proofs, is it common to have to draw pictures in order to continue? i was stuck at F = K - (O∩K) for a while until i drew a picture and saw that F = (G-O)∩K which i could take the complement of since it was a subset of G. my question is could F = (G-O)∩K be derived from F = K - (O∩K) or any of the other information i was given, without having to draw pictures to derive it? or is drawing pictures the usual way of going through these set theory types of proofs. thanks.