Seting up the Integral: Electric Potental Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the integral form of electric potential energy in the context of charge distributions. The user expresses confusion about the correct formulation of the integral, specifically how to apply it to symmetric charge distributions like disks or spheres. The key takeaway is that to find the electric potential, one must divide the charge distribution into small elements and integrate their contributions, using appropriate charge density formulas for volume, surface, or line distributions. The integral for electric potential is represented as V = k∫(ρ/r)dτ, where ρ is the charge density. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of symmetry and proper integration techniques in calculating electric potential energy.
cogman
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I hope that this belongs here, so here is what I would love help with. We are doing Electric potential energy in class right now (and we did electric field prior) but I am struggling with the form the integral needs to take. Once I get it, I can do the math, but it is just understanding all the parts that confuse me.

So here is what I know,

V = kq/r is the formula for 2 points

V = \int_{surface} k dq/dr I believe (not so sure)

dq = \int_{surface} dP/V Where V is volume, area, length.

Is this all correct? Or what am I missing? I would love some examples of how you guys would do it. For my class we are using mostly highly symmetric situations (IE how does a disk, washer, solid sphere effect electric potential of some point perpendicular to) so feel free to make your own up to illistrate the point.

Again thanks for the help. I was unsure on putting this in the homework section as it is not a homework problem I have a question about, but the concept instead.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula for Electrostatic PE is simple if you have point charges. When you have a charge distribution things get a bit more complicated. Essentially what you want to do is divide a charge distribution into small bits, that way you can apply the original formula to each small bit of charge and add them all up to get the end result.

Mathematically, to divide up a charge distribution use one of the following formula as appropriate. Note that the charge densities, rho, sigma and lambda might vary with position.

Volume: Q = \int_V \rho d\tau
Surface: Q = \int_A \sigma dA
Line: Q = \int \lambda dx

So now (taking volume as an example) you can write;

V = k\int_V \frac{\rho}{r}d\tau

At this point you have divided up the charge distribution into many small point charges, each with charge \rho.d\tau, calculated the contribution to V from each one, then summed them all via the integral.

From here, the problem will progress depending on the symmetry present.

Claude.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top