Shadow of light (Cardone et al)

  • Thread starter Thread starter my_wan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Shadow
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the empirical results presented in the paper "Shadow of Light" by Cardone et al., particularly comparing figure 5 to table 3 for clarity. Concerns are raised about the validity of these results, especially given the authors' history with piezonuclear reactions, which are challenging to verify. The experimental setup is noted to differ significantly from traditional beam crossing experiments, as the beams do not intersect in the conventional manner. There is interest in potentially replicating the experiment to explore the implications of the findings, especially regarding modifications to the switching mechanism. The conversation emphasizes the need for further investigation into the phenomena of ghost interference and its experimental applications.
my_wan
Messages
868
Reaction score
3
Subject: http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0504166"
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217979206033085"

I am more interested in the apparent empirical results than any particular characterization the authors suggest, which are laid out clearly enough simply by comparing figure 5 to table 3. Particularly I would like to know of any reasons to find these results suspect. I know these authors have published results on piezonuclear reactions that are going to be an uphill battle to verify. Also this experimental setup is quiet distinct from the beam crossing experiments mentioned in that the beams never actually cross in the usual sense.

Any further information or concerns about these results would be appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Perhaps I should try to repeat this myself. If this result is valid and a similar effect is can be observed after modifications to the switching mechanism it opens up a whole range of experimental possibilities. Cross beam type experiments could also be modified in a similar way. I need to bone up on the phenomena of ghost interference.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top