Classic double-slit experiment in a new light

  • #1
Wrichik Basu
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
2,048
2,304
190118145533_1_540x360.jpg

An intense beam of high-energy X-ray photons (violet) hits two adjacent iridium atoms (green) in the crystal. This excites electrons in the atoms for a short time. The atoms emit X-ray photons which overlap behind the two iridium atoms (red) and can be analyzed as interference images.

Credit: Markus Grueninger, University of Cologne

An international research team led by physicists from Collaborative Research Centre 1238, 'Control and Dynamics of Quantum Materials' at the University of Cologne has implemented a new variant of the basic double-slit experiment using resonant inelastic X-ray scattering at the European Synchrotron ESRF in Grenoble. This new variant offers a deeper understanding of the electronic structure of solids. Writing in Science Advances, the research group have now presented their results under the title 'Resonant inelastic x-ray incarnation of Young's double-slit experiment'.

Related news.

Journal reference:

A. Revelli, et al.
Resonant inelastic x-ray incarnation of Young’s double-slit experiment. Science Advances, 2019 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aav4020

Last Edit: Inserted correct picture.
 

Attachments

  • 190118145533_1_540x360.jpg
    190118145533_1_540x360.jpg
    17.8 KB · Views: 669
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu, mfb, davenn and 2 others

Answers and Replies

  • #2
14,297
8,343
Please note that the Science Daily article shows the wrong picture thumbnail ie mentions ingestible robots. However, if you click on it you’ll see the diffraction image in the first post of this thread.
 
  • #3
Wrichik Basu
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
2,048
2,304
Please note that the Science Daily article shows the wrong picture thumbnail ie mentions ingestible robots. However, if you click on it you’ll see the diffraction image in the first post of this thread.
They have corrected their mistake. Now, the proper picture can be seen.
 
  • #4
14,297
8,343
Not when I just clicked the link now. I even refreshed the page and it’s still there.

Perhaps they have another updated link or it’s a browser specific problem.
 
  • #5
Wrichik Basu
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
2,048
2,304
Not when I just clicked the link now. I even refreshed the page and it’s still there.

Perhaps they have another updated link or it’s a browser specific problem.
Could be browser specific. When I edited the post the last time, I could view the correct picture. I can see it now as well. Maybe it has something to do with cookies.
 
  • #7
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
27,927
6,393
This excites electrons in the atoms for a short time.
I have a bit of a problem with that. If there are two different atoms absorbing then emitting, then how can the phases of the two 'slits' be consistent and how can a coherent interference pattern form? There must be something I am missing - what is it?
 
  • #8
36,301
13,375
Only one of them absorbs it, but "we don't know which one" and the process is coherent.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #9
Wrichik Basu
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
2,048
2,304
I have a bit of a problem with that. If there are two different atoms absorbing then emitting, then how can the phases of the two 'slits' be consistent and how can a coherent interference pattern form? There must be something I am missing - what is it?
From the main article:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav4020 said:
The incident plane wave (blue) resonantly excites a core electron on one of two equivalent ##Ir## sites at ##r_1## and ##r_2##. This intermediate state decays to a quasi-molecular final state, which is delocalized over both sites, i.e., without which-path information. The emitted x-rays interfere with each other, giving rise to a double-slit-type sinusoidal interference pattern as a function of the transferred momentum ##q##, which points along ##r_1 − r_2##.
Emphasis added.

This supports what @mfb has said above.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #10
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
27,927
6,393
I was confused by the term "inelastic scattering" in the extract above when it seems that, in the paper (which I looked at later), they refer to "elastic" scattering. That would make a difference to whether there was phase coherence or not - I would have thought?
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu

Suggested for: Classic double-slit experiment in a new light

Replies
4
Views
558
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
224
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
919
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
695
Replies
10
Views
429
  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
965
Top