Shifting coordinates for mechanical problems

AI Thread Summary
Shifting coordinate systems in mechanical problems allows for the same physical results, though some frames simplify calculations. The process involves projecting forces into components aligned with the chosen axes, such as resolving gravitational force along a slope. While it may seem challenging to solve problems in non-aligned frames, vector calculations enable this by allowing projections in any direction. Different coordinate systems, like cylindrical or spherical coordinates, can be advantageous for specific scenarios, such as electric fields or orbital mechanics. Ultimately, selecting the appropriate coordinate frame is crucial for effectively addressing physics problems.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
More and more my teacher has talked about how results for mechanical problems are the same no matter what our coordinate system is (though it may be easier to calculate them in some coordinate frames). I must however admit, that I have never really had a clear explanation of what it means to do a problem in different coordinates. Suppose we have a point mass sliding down a frictionless slope and want to find its acceleration. We project the force of gravity onto the direction parallel to the slope and find the acceleration of it. Is this procedure of splitting your force vector into vectors in different directions, what is meant by shifting the coordinate frame? Because if so, how would you ever solve a problem in another frame than the one with axis parallel to the slope and perpendicular to it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine the coordinate system with x parallel to the flat ground and y perpendicular to the flat ground. Could you still find the force along the direction of the slope?
 
Yes by projecting gravity perpendicular and parallel to the slope. But isn't that the same as changing coordinate system.
 
Different co-ordinates can mean a lot of things. Apart from the fact that it's often easier to work with your axes at an angle (Resolving forces parallel and perpendicular to an incline for example), you may find it's easier to use really wild co-ordinates like cylindrical and spherical polar co-ordinates.

For example, in calculating the electric field around a wire we would use cylindrical co-ordinates. In a problem involving satellites and orbits, we'd use spherical ones.

But as to your question about solving a problem in a different frame than tilted along the slope? The answer is to use vector calculations, which can be quite difficult. Physics is often about finding crafty ways to tackle a problem and choosing the right frame is the number one step.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top