A Shocker: PR Box is logically inconsistent

jimgraber
Gold Member
Messages
247
Reaction score
18
If correct, Uzan refutes Popescu and Rohrlich.
To me this seems like a big deal.

Super-Quantum, Non-Signaling Correlations Cannot Exist
Pierre Uzan
http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.01135

Comments?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Huh? This paper shows that PR boxes cannot exist if you assume that the quantum description of correlation experiments (in terms of Hilbert spaces, observables, etc.) is the correct one. This isn't news. The whole point of the PR box is that it is a hypothetical example of correlations that are more nonlocal than (and thus not allowed by) quantum physics but which still satisfy the no-signalling constraints.
 
I could be wrong, but I think it says that PR boxes are mathematically inconsistent, contrary to what was previously believed.
 
Closed pending moderation
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top