Short Title: Does Einstein's Special Relativity Disprove the Existence of Ether?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spastik_Relativity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Couple
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding key concepts in physics, particularly related to Einstein's theory of special relativity and the existence of a true vacuum. It clarifies that special relativity does not prove a true vacuum's existence and effectively discredits the ether theory, emphasizing that motion is always relative. The significance of light's behavior in materials like glass is explained as a result of absorption and re-emission by atoms rather than a change in light speed. The graviton is described as a massless spin-2 particle, with resources suggested for further reading. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of modern physics and the misconceptions surrounding these foundational theories.
Spastik_Relativity
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hi to anyone reading this. This is my first thread on this site. I am enthusiastic and very interested in physics. Currently i am trying to understand the universe around me. I have a couple of questions id like to ask and if they could be answered that would be greatly appreciated.
Personally i believe in and ether thus the questions i have are simple but I am lost.

1.What is the exact reason why/how Einstien's theory of special relativity proves the existence of a true vacuum?

2. Why is the idea of light slowing down in a solid transparent material such as glass so significant?

3. Are there any predicted properties of a graviton and where could i read about them?

and finally this may seem a bit weird but

4. Has anyone ever conducted the search for an ether using a light beam that travels perpendiuclar to the Earth rather that horizontal to it?

Thanks for reading

p.s. I am still in high school so don't be too harsh on me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.What is the exact reason why/how Einstien's theory of special relativity proves the existence of a true vacuum?

As far as I know it doesn't. Quantum Field Theory shows us that a 'true' vacuum is not possible. Quantum Field Theory is derived with respect to SR.

2. Why is the idea of light slowing down in a solid transparent material such as glass so significant?

It doesn't really slow down. Light always travels at same speed. It's the fact that it's absorbed and reemitted by atoms which seems to slow it down. This is basically what physical optics studies.

3. Are there any predicted properties of a graviton and where could i read about them?

The graviton should be a massless spin-2 particle. Google for graviton. Beware of crack pot sites. If you know QFT, google scholar or http://xxx.lanl.gov is your best bet.

4. Has anyone ever conducted the search for an ether using a light beam that travels perpendiuclar to the Earth rather that horizontal to it?

I won't comment on anything regarding ether theory. It's been dead for many years and to my knowledge hasn't been modified to explain all the phenomena the theory of relativity explains.
 
Last edited:
thanks for the help.
and in regards to those crackpot sites they really do throw people like me off!
 
1.What is the exact reason why/how Einstien's theory of special relativity proves the existence of a true vacuum?

It doesn't prove the existence of a true vacuum, but it does disprove the idea of an 'ether'. This is because a central idea of SR is that motion is always relative, there is no such thing as rest (it is impossible to say who is moving and who isn't, because they are both moving relative to each other). If there were an ether, you could measure motion relative to the absolute either (throwing away the idea that motion is always relative). The way Einstein discovered the relativity of motion involves electromagnetism.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top