Shortest path on dynamic graph

Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
Shortest path on dynamic "graph"

Suppose you have n objects orbiting Earth with velocities v1, ..., vn. Starting from t=0, the objects are at positions x1,..., xn; how do you calculate at what point they will be at a state such that the shortest path (arcs of great cirlces) connecting all of them will exist? Is it possible that no such configuration exists (there will always be a shorter one)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
I don't know how to describe the answer mathematically but I think such a state exists since the satellites have different velocities. So considering an infinite time there will be a high probability for such a state to exist.
 
Since you say the paths joining the particles are arcs of great circles, I assume that x1, x2, ... ,xn are each two-dimensional coordinates x_i = (\theta_i,\phi_i) and all of the objects are constrained to a spherical shell with radius greater than the earth.

First, consider the case where the all the objects lie on a great circle (wolog, take \phi_i t be zero for each i). Two cases:

Case 1: For each i,j we have \frac{v_i}{v_j} be a rational number. In this case there is some time t* (in fact infinitely many such times since the motion is periodic in this case) such that x_i = x_j for all i,j. In other words, all the "objects" collide simultaneously at time t*. The proof of this consist of trig identities.

Case 2. If any two of the orbits are not commensurate, then there is always a shorter distance. This is a consequence of the above trig identities and the fact that the image of the Sequence {Sin(n)} is dense in [0,1].

The extension to the general case only requires that we consider not the ratios between the magnitudes of the velocities, but rather all possible ratios between (both of) the components of (each of) the velocities. If these ratios are all rational, then there is a time when the particles will coincide; otherwise there will always be a shorter time. The proof is in the same spirit as the above.
 
Suppose I want to graph the infimum something like this, what software would I have to use?
 
The infimum is always zero, I apologize for not making that clear.

It sounds like you might be more interested in a statistical analysis, e.g. what is the chance that the path between the objects is smaller than distance x before time t (where time t could be a billion years).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top