News Should Attorney General Holder Read Laws Before Commenting on Them?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WhoWee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether Attorney General Eric Holder should comment on legislation, specifically Arizona's immigration law, before thoroughly reading it. Concerns are raised about the pressures on Holder to respond without full familiarity with the law, suggesting that he likely relied on summaries from staff. Critics argue that this behavior is prevalent among politicians, leading to uninformed commentary and potential oversight of important details within legislation. The conversation highlights the issue of lengthy legal documents, which may discourage thorough reading and allow for hidden provisions, such as pork barrel projects, to be included unnoticed. The Arizona immigration law itself is noted to be relatively concise, approximately ten pages long, contrasting with the complexity of many legislative documents.
Physics news on Phys.org
Some staffer probably gave him news stories and a summary on it. He is a busy man I assume and does not have time to read all legislation from various states. Of course he certainly ought not be commenting on it if he has not actually read it. He was probably under pressure to make comments and made the stupid decision to go ahead and make them without properly familiarizing himself.
 
There seems to be far too much of this behavior going on lately - on both sides.
 
Holder is a pale shadow of Mukasey. Obama kept Gates, he should have kept Mukasey too.
 
Well you got a team of lawyers sitting around writting these up and you end up with 100s or 1000s of pages of mumbo jumbo. I wouldn't read that crap if i was a politician. The sad thing is is this is how pork barrel projects can be so easily slipped into bills - because no one actually reads the darn things!
 
BishopUser said:
Well you got a team of lawyers sitting around writting these up and you end up with 100s or 1000s of pages of mumbo jumbo. I wouldn't read that crap if i was a politician. The sad thing is is this is how pork barrel projects can be so easily slipped into bills - because no one actually reads the darn things!

The bill in question is actually quite short. About ten pages I think the article said.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
116
Views
18K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
50
Views
9K
Back
Top