Programs Should I add a second major in Math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GaugeSymmetry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Major
AI Thread Summary
Pursuing a double major in Mathematics alongside an undergraduate degree in Physics can enhance understanding in various physics fields, particularly in areas like High Energy Theory, Condensed Matter Theory, and Quantum Optics. While many professors in these fields hold only a BSc in Physics, a solid mathematical foundation can be beneficial, especially for advanced topics requiring higher-level math. Courses such as differential geometry, complex analysis, and real analysis are highlighted as particularly useful. However, there is a trade-off to consider; dedicating time to a second major may limit opportunities for physics-focused coursework or research. Ultimately, the decision should align with personal interests and career goals in the physics domain.
GaugeSymmetry
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
So I will soon be beginning an undergraduate degree in physics, going to a highly reputable university in Canada. My question is in regards to adding a second major in Math. I know that it's most likely to early for me to decide what area of physics I wan't to specialise in, but through lost of independent learning, and curiosity, I find my self interested in three main areas. High Energy Theory, Condensed Matter Theory, and Quantum Optics (particularly quantum information theory). Adding a second major means a slew of other courses, which I don't particularly mind, but I am concerned weather they will be of any use to me. I can definitely see courses like differential geometry, groups, rings, and complex analysis helping me out, but those are just a small number of courses that the second major would require. All of this got me thinking, so I checked the faculty website, and to my surprise, found that none of the professors in the High Energy theory area, had anything but the typical Bsc in physics. Most of the professors are older, so it could be that now one needs a more extensive background in order to enter those research areas, but I have been told that most if not all the mathematics required, is introduced in mathematical physics courses. What are your thoughts on this matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on what you want to do. There's a wide range of subjects and styles, from very mathematical to fairly non-mathematical.

I think there are several Nobel Prize winners who got a double major, if I remember right.

I'm more on the math side. It's my suspicion that getting a double major would help you to understand things better in physics. I took a graduate class in general relativity, and I think it definitely helps there. There are various areas that require PhD level math. String theory, loop quantum gravity, and anyonic condensed matter systems are very closely related to what I'm doing in my math PhD work (topological quantum field theory). Also, maybe it's helpful in terms of learning to think, even if you don't use it directly.

If complex analysis is relevant, then so is real analysis because it's close enough that it will add to your understanding of complex analysis. That, plus the other stuff you mentioned might cover enough for a degree. Electives like PDE would be helpful as well.

It's not necessary, but is a viable choice if you want to be more on the mathematical side of physics. The only thing is there might be a trade-off because maybe you could spend more time on physics stuff or doing research.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Back
Top