Should i rethink engineering or repeat classes

AI Thread Summary
Concerns about pursuing engineering due to a B in calculus and a CGPA of 2.73 are addressed by emphasizing the importance of understanding personal goals within the field. Key considerations include the specific engineering discipline and job aspirations, as not all engineering roles require the same level of proficiency in calculus. Many successful engineers have graduated with GPAs around 3.0, indicating that a B is generally acceptable. The focus should be on improving overall academic performance and determining whether retaking classes is necessary based on individual circumstances and the reasons behind lower grades. Ultimately, if the passion for engineering remains strong, there is no need to abandon the pursuit.
phyEngineer
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Should I rethink engineering if I am pulling a B in calculus? and My CGPA will be 2.73 at the end of this term.

OR

Should I repeat some of the classes that I did not do well in?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What type of engineer do you want to be and what concentration within it? What exactly do you want to do for your job within that concentration? Why is a B in calculus possibly bad in your mind? What are the other classes you are considering retaking? What was the cause of the lower than wanted grade?

These are important questions, because not all tasks associated with engineering demand the same levels from certain skill sets, which includes calculus. I know people who struggled their entire way through engineering, finishing with a 3.0ish GPA. They're hired now and get paid. So basically a B is fine and your GPA is probably fine. You just need to start working harder to bump it up above a 3.0 (out of 4.0). If you have the right answers to all these questions, I don't see why you should reconsider engineering.
 
Last edited:
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top