Should I switch to a different calculus textbook?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
AI Thread Summary
Spivak's Calculus is recognized as a challenging text, leading to frustration among many students, particularly those accustomed to easier materials. The exercises often require deep thought and persistence, with some problems taking days to solve. It's advised that students should not give up quickly or rely on solution books, as true understanding comes from grappling with difficult concepts. Instead, seeking help from peers or discussing problems in forums can be more beneficial. While it's normal to feel overwhelmed, especially for those transitioning from high school to university-level mathematics, embracing the struggle is part of the learning process. Students are encouraged to invest more time in problem-solving, as the difficulty of mathematics will only increase in advanced studies.
Andrax
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
I'm having major problems with spivak's claculus , i find the exercises very difficult , sometimes i think my answer is correct and the answer provided in the solution book is completely different , it's really putting me off
should i switch to another book?the problems are really hard you don't even know what you have to prove sometimes..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this your first calculus book that you've read?? If it is, then you should absolutely try an easier book first.

Spivak is a very hard book. Almost everybody has problems with the exerices. You should absolutely try to post solutions here on PF, so we can help you with it.
 
micromass said:
Is this your first calculus book that you've read?? If it is, then you should absolutely try an easier book first.

Spivak is a very hard book. Almost everybody has problems with the exerices. You should absolutely try to post solutions here on PF, so we can help you with it.
No this is not my first calculus books , i used to be very good at calculus but the exercises can't even be compared to those on stivak's , i don't like to be "defeated" by exercises so i stick with em for like 30 minutes + until i completely lose hope then i look @solutions ,anyways i thinki I'm going to switch books
 
30 minutes is no where near long enough to give up on a problem. When I took a course on Spivak (given I'm not the brightest light bulb in the package) some problems I could easily chew on for a couple of days before it finally clicked in my head. It is the process of struggling, rereading, relearning, and connecting dots that Spivak forces you to do that makes his Calculus book a good book.
 
Andrax said:
i don't like to be "defeated" by exercises

That's not a good attitude, but it is understandable. I think most people in university are surprised how more difficult it is than high school. This may cause you to be frustrated and to lose hope.

However, you should know that, although Spivak is quite difficult, there are more difficult books out there. Things will not remain as easy as you found calculus. The difficulty level will increase significantly throughout the years. And eventually, it will be so difficult that you will be solving unsolved problems. It's a steep road, and this might be frustrating.

But giving up and reading the solutions will truly get you nowhere. You really don't learn anything that way. So you should absolutely stop reading the solutions. Of course, if you are really stuck, then you can always ask for help here or ask for hints. This is way better than just reading the solution.

And 30 minutes really is not very long. Later on in your education, you will meet problems that will take you days. This is not uncommon. So don't feel "stupid" if you can't solve anything in 30 minutes.
 
i second the consensus. try to enjoy the work, and then hang in there much longer than 30 minutes. the longest i ever spent on a problem was maybe 5 years.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Back
Top