Should I use this recommendation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlete
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Recommendation
AI Thread Summary
When preparing graduate school applications, the choice of recommendation letters is crucial. Applicants typically need three letters, ideally from professors who know them well. If two letters are strong but the third is weaker, it may be beneficial to consider a stronger letter from a non-physics source, such as a state senator, especially if it adds a unique perspective. Competitive programs often prefer letters from research-oriented professors, but a compelling recommendation from a notable figure can enhance an application. Additionally, for those with strong letters from both physics and math professors, a combination of two physics letters and one math letter is generally acceptable. Ultimately, the focus should be on submitting the strongest letters available, even if it means including a non-traditional recommendation.
mathlete
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
So I'm preparing the final stages for my grad apps and I need to decide what recommendation letters to send. They all require 3, but the problem is I didn't really get to know all the professors in my department that well so only 2 of them are from a professor who knows me, the third would be somewhat weaker I think. The thing is, I also have a recommendation that would be stronger, from another source (a state senator). The only thing is that it is not particularly physics related... would it be OK to use this as my 3rd recommendation, or should I stick to only physics professors?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if you've got two letters from physics people, then a third from a state senator would be pretty good I think.
 
Critical to this too is: what schools are you applying to? Typically, the most competitive grad programs look for at least three strong research letters (some programs even want FOUR letters), but if you don't have that, being interesting in such a manner would help... and if it is stronger than a lukewarm physics letter, give it a try.
 
I have a related question. I will be applying for physics grad school in fall 07. At this point, I think I can two strong letters from physics profs, and two strong letters from math profs. The standard for most schools seems to be three letters. Should I include 2 strong letters from physics profs and 1 from a math prof, or should I have all 3 letters from physics profs, where one of the letters might not be strong?
 
Last edited:
unit_circle said:
I have a related question. I will be applying for physics grad school in fall 07. At this point, I think I can two strong letters from physics profs, and two strong letters from math profs. The standard for most schools seems to be three letters. Should I include 2 strong letters from physics profs and 1 from a math prof, or should I have all 3 letters from physics profs, where one of the letters might not be strong?

Why not send all four?!
 
I would choose your strongest letters. 2 physics and 1 math seems a good balance (and esp. good if you want to do theory).
 
Send all four!

Is it that hard?
 
Back
Top