Should it be upside or downside

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
how does the triangle symbol in Helmholtz Equation should be?
is it like the attach file in here.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
or like this attach file.

btw, can you attach more then one file in here?
 
Last edited:
If I remember correctly, then they are both the same. nabla squared is sometimes denoted as a triangle with the sharp side up.

So:

\nabla^2 \equiv \Delta
 
I've always seen it point down.

Njorl
 
I also usually see \nabla^2. But \Delta is perfectly valid.

Personally I prefer \nabla^2. It makes it more clear what operation you're actually performing. Plus it help avoid defining a new symbol for every single mathematical operation. And \Delta is already used enough anyway.

In the Helmholtz equation in particular \nabla^2 looks better.
\nabla^2\psi+k^2\psi=0 is more symmetric.
 
loop quantum gravity: note well it is \nabla^2 and \Delta that are the same not \nablaand \Delta!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top