Should the average undergrad be able to solve most of Griffiths' QM problems?

AI Thread Summary
Struggling with three-star problems in Griffiths' quantum mechanics textbook is a common experience for third-year physics majors. It is normal to find these challenging, as many students rely on hints from professors or discussions with peers and teaching assistants to tackle them. Successfully solving all problems independently at this stage is considered exceptional, and not being able to do so does not indicate a lack of understanding or ability. Engaging with others and seeking guidance is a typical part of the learning process in advanced physics courses.
annms
Messages
15
Reaction score
3
I am a third year physics major and am studying quantum mechanics using Griffiths' textbook.

I can do most of the problems with one star or no stars with relatively little effort, but a lot of the problems with three stars I find very difficult and I cannot do them at all.

For the average undergraduate physics major taking quantum mechanics, should I be able to solve all of Griffiths question? Am I doing bad if I can't solve a lot of his three star problems?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
annms said:
I am a third year physics major and am studying quantum mechanics using Griffiths' textbook.

I can do most of the problems with one star or no stars with relatively little effort, but a lot of the problems with three stars I find very difficult and I cannot do them at all.

For the average undergraduate physics major taking quantum mechanics, should I be able to solve all of Griffiths question? Am I doing bad if I can't solve a lot of his three star problems?

That is perfectly normal. Typically professors will give hints on 3-star problems or students will discuss them with others and/or a teaching assistant. After obtaining some necessary "trick" through these discussions, the problems become much simpler, generally. Students that solve all of those problems by themselves at your stage are exceptional.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top