Should You Pursue a PhD in Science?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tallus Bryne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scientist
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around an article by Jonathan I. Katz titled "Don't Become a Scientist!" which discourages pursuing PhDs in physics and science in general. An undergraduate physics student seeks opinions on the article, particularly from those who are currently pursuing or have completed a PhD. The conversation highlights the tension between the value of advanced degrees and the realities of academic careers. Some participants argue that having more PhDs can enhance scientific literacy and knowledge, while others resonate with Katz's cautionary perspective. The need for a realistic understanding of the academic landscape is emphasized, with participants encouraged to share their experiences in existing threads.
Tallus Bryne
Messages
34
Reaction score
8
"Don't Become a Scientist!"

First of all, I'd like to say that I'm an undergraduate physics student in Florida. I would like to go on to get a PhD in physics, but my knowledge on what to expect after that is quite limited. A friend of mine recently sent me an article written by Jonathan I. Katz, a professor of physics at Washington University, St. Louis, Mo. It is called "Don't Become a Scientist!"(http://wuphys.wustl.edu/~katz/scientist.html ). In the article, Professor Katz not only discourages students from pursuing PhDs in physics but also from pursuing science-focused PhD's in general. To anyone willing to take time to read the article, I would like to hear your opinion on the subject. For those of you who actually have or are attempting to get your PhD, I'd appreciate your point of view on this, especially. I'd rather a realistic perspective over a pessimistic one, and with this author it's hard to discern the realistic from the pessimistic. The best way I know how to achieve this is to seek out the people in this specific position themselves.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
There have been similar discussions like https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=576359.

I am not a physicist, but am sympathetic to the point of view expressed by Choppy in #4 of that thread. I believe that having lots of PhDs is good because knowledge is power, and experimentation done carefully and correctly is a way of getting knowledge. One can do science outside of academia, of course, eg. in baseball, but academic science is a route. I think having fewer PhDs would make scientists more elite, when one actually wants the opposite, having wide scientific literacy in the public. Again, having a PhD is not the only way to be scientifically literate, but it is a way.

I also recommend twofish-quant's and ParticleGrl's posts.
 
Since we already have (several) open threads, discussion should go on there.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top