Should You Pursue Undergrad Research if You Prefer Theory Over Experimentation?

AI Thread Summary
Pursuing theoretical research in graduate school does not necessarily require undergraduate research experience, especially if experimental work is unappealing. However, graduate programs often prefer candidates who demonstrate research productivity, whether through theoretical or experimental avenues. Engaging in any form of undergraduate research can provide valuable skills, such as problem-solving, analytical thinking, and teamwork, which are crucial for a career in science. Even if the research is not directly related to future goals, it can offer insights into the scientific process and foster unexpected ideas. Additionally, contributing to calculations or computational work can be a viable alternative for those leaning towards theory. Overall, while not mandatory, undergraduate research is beneficial for developing a well-rounded skill set.
ice109
Messages
1,707
Reaction score
6
im pretty sure i want to do theory in grad school because i don't like experiment. so i don't really want to do undergrad research that involves turning knobs and righting down numbers. nor am i able to contribute to a theory group. what am i to do? would research in math be sufficient? do i really have to do undergrad research?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ice109 said:
im pretty sure i want to do theory in grad school because i don't like experiment. so i don't really want to do undergrad research that involves turning knobs and righting down numbers. nor am i able to contribute to a theory group. what am i to do? would research in math be sufficient? do i really have to do undergrad research?

You don't have to do anything. However I'm sure grad schools would like to see proof that you will be a productive researcher, be it theoretical or based on lab findings. Your graduate research does not need to be related to any undergrad projects. Find a professor who's involved in something that is even close to your interests and see if he/she would like an assistant.
 
ice109 said:
im pretty sure i want to do theory in grad school because i don't like experiment. so i don't really want to do undergrad research that involves turning knobs and righting down numbers. nor am i able to contribute to a theory group. what am i to do? would research in math be sufficient? do i really have to do undergrad research?
any kind of undergraduate research helps in the bigger picture. remember you won't be learning just what you are apparently doing (eg. learning how to turn the knots on the CRO or how to enter data in Excel), what is more valuable is to understand the process of research: the thinking through, the ability to tackle unexpected challenges, the skills in analysis, making rational decisions when you can't do everything and when things turn out to be non-ideal, how to communicate your results to others, how to work as in a small team etc.

besides more general knowledge doesn't hurt. A good ideas can come from anywhere... usually places you least expect! good luck
 
I'm just going into my fourth year of a Physics degree and I'm currently doing undergrad research. Take it from me, it''s incredibly valuable. Even if it's nothing to with your desired PhD, there is so much else to learn! You get so many valuable insights into life AS a scientist. Your work will probably be minor, but that isn't really the point of it!
 
While you mentioned possible experimental and theoretical contributions from an undergraduate doing research, another way is to help do calculations, analytically or computationally (possibly using tools like Java, C++, Python, or Maple).
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
940
Replies
82
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Back
Top