Should You Use Indefinite Integrals for Deriving Formulas of 1/(x+1)?

AI Thread Summary
When deriving formulas for the derivative of 1/(x+1), it is more appropriate to use an indefinite integral rather than a definite integral. The fundamental theorem of calculus pertains to definite integrals, which focus on specific areas under curves, while the task here requires a general formula. An indefinite integral represents the antiderivative, which in this case can be found using the power rule, resulting in ln(x+1) + C. Thus, for this scenario, an indefinite integral is the correct approach. This clarification emphasizes the distinction between definite and indefinite integrals in calculus.
courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
When they ask you to set up integral formulas for the derivative of 1/(x+1), would you use the fundamental theorem of calculus and set up a definite integral, or an indefinite integral. Can someone help me clarify this?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Integral formulas are (almost to my knowledge) expressed in indefinite inegrals, since all you need is an antiderivative of the integrand.

i.e.
\int\frac{dx}{x}=\ln x+C
 
for your question! When setting up integral formulas for the derivative of 1/(x+1), it is important to first consider what information is being asked for. The fundamental theorem of calculus applies to definite integrals, which involve finding the area under a curve between two specific points. In this case, it does not seem like we are being asked for a specific area, but rather the general formula for the derivative of 1/(x+1).

Therefore, it would be more appropriate to use an indefinite integral. An indefinite integral does not have specific limits of integration, but rather represents the antiderivative of a function. In this case, we can use the power rule for integration to find the antiderivative of 1/(x+1), which would give us ln(x+1) + C.

In summary, when asked to set up integral formulas for the derivative of 1/(x+1), it would be more appropriate to use an indefinite integral rather than the fundamental theorem of calculus. I hope this helps clarify things for you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top