Shouldb constant acceleration when simulating magnus effect?

AI Thread Summary
In simulating the Magnus effect for a projectile in a game, the projectile should experience a rightward velocity increase due to constant acceleration while spinning. The rightward acceleration may not remain constant throughout the projectile's flight, as air drag can alter the acceleration by opposing forward velocity. As the projectile slows down, the Magnus effect diminishes due to reduced air drag. Energy conservation is a relevant consideration in this context. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for achieving realistic projectile behavior.
WilkinzMicawber
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I am coding a game in which I desire a projectile to undergo realistic curving when rotating while moving through the air. Let's consider the instance of a projectile that is initially moving forward while spinning clockwise along an axis placed vertically in it is center of mass. The object should gain increasing rightward velocity with constant acceleration, so that the path is a curve, correct? Should the rightward acceleration be constant through its entire trip, or does the air somehow act to change the acceleration as it moves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WilkinzMicawber said:
Should the rightward acceleration be constant through its entire trip, or does the air somehow act to change the acceleration as it moves?
Is energy conserved?
 
The magnus effect is created by the air drag, which opposes the forward velocity. So, as the ball slows, the effect should lessen.
 
Last edited:
Aannndddd, with a little thought you've answered your question.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Thread 'Free fall of person in a sled to direct horizontal motion by atmospheric resistance'

Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
View full post »

Similar threads

Bernoulli to explain Magnus Effect
Replies
2
Views
3K
I Relative Strength of the Magnus effect relative to gravity
Replies
25
Views
3K
I Does a rotating accelerometer moving linearly measure linear velocity?
Replies
47
Views
4K
Spinning ball deviation from straight path | Magnus effect
Replies
1
Views
3K
How Do Equations of Motion Apply When Acceleration is Constant?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Why do bullets precess in the opposite way from gyroscope diagrams?
Replies
23
Views
3K
Forces when car wheels "lay rubber"
Replies
5
Views
2K
When does the Magnus force take effect?
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Acceleration through curved paths
Replies
39
Views
4K
Troubleshooting a Simulation: Acceleration & Velocity Lost in a Jump
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top