Shouldb constant acceleration when simulating magnus effect?

AI Thread Summary
In simulating the Magnus effect for a projectile in a game, the projectile should experience a rightward velocity increase due to constant acceleration while spinning. The rightward acceleration may not remain constant throughout the projectile's flight, as air drag can alter the acceleration by opposing forward velocity. As the projectile slows down, the Magnus effect diminishes due to reduced air drag. Energy conservation is a relevant consideration in this context. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for achieving realistic projectile behavior.
WilkinzMicawber
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I am coding a game in which I desire a projectile to undergo realistic curving when rotating while moving through the air. Let's consider the instance of a projectile that is initially moving forward while spinning clockwise along an axis placed vertically in it is center of mass. The object should gain increasing rightward velocity with constant acceleration, so that the path is a curve, correct? Should the rightward acceleration be constant through its entire trip, or does the air somehow act to change the acceleration as it moves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WilkinzMicawber said:
Should the rightward acceleration be constant through its entire trip, or does the air somehow act to change the acceleration as it moves?
Is energy conserved?
 
The magnus effect is created by the air drag, which opposes the forward velocity. So, as the ball slows, the effect should lessen.
 
Last edited:
Aannndddd, with a little thought you've answered your question.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »

Similar threads

Bernoulli to explain Magnus Effect
Replies
2
Views
3K
I Relative Strength of the Magnus effect relative to gravity
Replies
25
Views
4K
I Does a rotating accelerometer moving linearly measure linear velocity?
Replies
47
Views
4K
Spinning ball deviation from straight path | Magnus effect
Replies
1
Views
3K
How Do Equations of Motion Apply When Acceleration is Constant?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Why do bullets precess in the opposite way from gyroscope diagrams?
Replies
23
Views
3K
Forces when car wheels "lay rubber"
Replies
5
Views
2K
When does the Magnus force take effect?
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Acceleration through curved paths
Replies
39
Views
5K
Troubleshooting a Simulation: Acceleration & Velocity Lost in a Jump
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top