Shouldn't a wire (coil) just store energy and not give it away?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ataskaita
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coil Energy Wire
AI Thread Summary
Induced currents in a wire occur when a changing magnetic field generates an electromotive force (EMF) that opposes changes in the magnetic field, not the applied current. When the external current stops, the collapsing magnetic field induces an EMF that attempts to maintain current flow. This process illustrates that energy is stored in the magnetic field and released as current when the external source is removed. The discussion highlights a misunderstanding of the relationship between induced EMF and Newton's laws, clarifying that the induced EMF does not directly oppose the applied current but rather the change in the magnetic field. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these electromagnetic principles accurately.
ataskaita
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was thinking about induced currents in a wire(coil). For example when a current from an external source passes through a wire - the changing magnetic field induces a current opposing the current applied (back emf) like a Newton's 3 law and nothing would ever pass through a wire, but the good part is that the magnetic field produces back emf only when the field is changing, which means that sooner or later there will be no change and no back emf. No back emf - current can flow. Which brings me to the things happening to the wire when the current is stopped: current is stopped, magnetic field collapses and produces current in the opposite direction, but then i think - shouldn't the current produced sort of oppose the collapse of the magnetic field? Or if it can't oppose the collapse of the magnetic field, maybe it can by being created by magnetic field create it's own magnetic field, which would create current, which would oppose the creation of the current creating it and so on, on and on creating back emf, which creates back emf and then a back emf creates again back emf and so on and nothing happens... The first part has some logic, at least for me, because when a current is applied by external source sooner or later the will be no change in magnetic field- hence no back emf and a flow of current, but in the case of a wire, which has energy induced in it in the form of the magnetic field, shouldn't the magnetic field just fight it self and nothing would happen, because of no external current source- any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to get your logic sorted out.
A changing magnetic field produces an induced emf, (not a current), the direction of the induced emf opposes the change in the magnetic field (not the current applied).
Newtons 3rd law has nothing to do with induced emfs.
 
ataskaita said:
Which brings me to the things happening to the wire when the current is stopped: current is stopped, magnetic field collapses and produces current in the opposite direction, but then i think - shouldn't the current produced sort of oppose the collapse of the magnetic field?

This is incorrect. When the current begins to stop, the changing magnetic field generates an EMF that tries to keep the current flowing. Thus energy is stored in the magnetic field and delivered to the wire as EMF that causes current to flow after the external power source is removed.
 
Drakkith said:
This is incorrect. When the current begins to stop, the changing magnetic field generates an EMF that tries to keep the current flowing. Thus energy is stored in the magnetic field and delivered to the wire as EMF that causes current to flow after the external power source is removed.
OK, back to textbook:D
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top