Programs Shouldn't engineering majors have as strong of a background in math

  • Thread starter Thread starter Minhtran1092
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineering
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights a perceived gap in the treatment of calculus within electrical engineering curricula, emphasizing that many engineers learn computation without rigorous mathematical foundations. It argues that while advanced mathematics is essential for mathematicians, engineers often do not require the same level of rigor or depth in subjects like number theory and analysis. Some participants believe that a rigorous understanding of math can enhance comprehension in specific engineering fields, but overall, the consensus is that most engineers do not need extensive mathematical training to succeed. The conversation suggests that the practical application of math in engineering often outweighs the need for theoretical knowledge. Ultimately, while a solid grasp of calculus is important, it is seen as just the beginning of a math major's journey, not a necessity for engineering excellence.
Minhtran1092
Messages
28
Reaction score
2
mathematics (on the subjects of calculus, linear algebra, differential equation) as math majors? It seems like my electrical engineering curriculum doesn't give calculus proper treatment. It basically had me learn how to do computation but never led me on to study calculus rigorously (as one would do in a "Real Analysis" course). Would you agree that any good engineer is a mathematician?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No...calculus is just the baby steps of a mathematics major's undergraduate experience. In fact some come into college with calculus already behind them...
 
I also do not agree. I will be able to do more advanced math than plenty of non-engineers, but I won't have or need a strong background in number theory, analysis, and proofs that a mathematician must have to succeed. My job will be to create devices, not theorems.
 
Minhtran1092 said:
mathematics (on the subjects of calculus, linear algebra, differential equation) as math majors? It seems like my electrical engineering curriculum doesn't give calculus proper treatment. It basically had me learn how to do computation but never led me on to study calculus rigorously (as one would do in a "Real Analysis" course). Would you agree that any good engineer is a mathematician?

No. The vast majority of electrical engineers really don't need anything near the level of rigor that a mathematician would see. A lot of them don't even need all the math they learned throughout their degree. Personally, I think the rigorous approach to EE math is interesting can help to provide a deeper understanding, and it's probably useful in some areas of engineering research (maybe like random noise/signal processing?) but I certainly wouldn't say that a rigorous approach to mathematics is necessary for being a good engineer. The amount of benefit most engineers would get from a rigorous approach to math is very small, I think, when compared to the amount of extra work required.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top