MHB Show Diagonals of Kite are Perpendicular

  • Thread starter Thread starter brinlin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perpendicular
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the diagonals of a kite are perpendicular. A user suggests labeling the intersection of diagonals AC and BD as point E, setting it as the origin, and placing points A, C, B, and D on the coordinate axes. Through vector analysis, it is shown that the lengths of segments AB and CB are equal, as are segments AD and CD, confirming the kite's properties. The dot product of the diagonals AC and BD is calculated to be zero, establishing their perpendicularity. The approach emphasizes the geometric arrangement of the points to support the proof.
brinlin
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Pre14.PNG
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"AB- BC"? Do mean "AB= BD"? Personally, I would NOT "let B be the origin". I would label the point where AC and BD intersect "E" and let that be the origin. Then A is (-a, 0) for some number, a, and C is (a, 0). B is (0, b) and D is (0,-d) (d is not necessarily equal to b). Then AB= <0, b>- <a, 0>= <a, b> and CB= <0, b>- <a, 0>= <-a, b> so that AB and CB have the same length, $\sqrt{a^2+ b^2}$. AD= <0, -d>- <-a, 0>= <a, -d> and CD= <0, -d>- <a, 0>= <a, -d> so that AD and CD also have the same length, $\sqrt{a^2+ d^2}$. Yes this is a "kite".

The diagonals are AC and BD. AC= <-a, 0>- <a, 0>= <-2a, 0>. BD= <0, b>- <0, d>= <0, b- d>. The dot product of AC and BD is <-2a, 0>.<0, b-d>= (-2a)(0)+ (0)(b-d)= 0. Therefore the diagonals are perpendicular..
 
brinlin said:
Taking $B$ as the origin, let $A,C,D$ be represented by vectors $\def\v{\mathbf} \v a,\v c,\v d$. You are told that $AB = BC$, which says that $\v{a.a} = \v{c.c}$. Also, $CD = DA$, so that $(\v d - \v c)\v.(\v d - \v c) = (\v d - \v a)\v.(\v d - \v a)$. Using those equations, you want to show that $AC = BD$, or in other words $(\v c - \v a).\v d = \v 0$.
Country Boy said:
I would label the point where AC and BD intersect "E" and let that be the origin. Then A is (-a, 0) for some number, a, and C is (a, 0). B is (0, b) and D is (0,-d) ...
By choosing $A$ and $C$ to be on the $x$-axis, and $B$ and $D$ to be on the $y$-axis, you are assuming that $AC$ is perpendicular to $BD$, which is what you are supposed to be proving.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K