Show EM Wave equation invariant under a Lorentz Transformation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating the invariance of the electromagnetic wave equation under Lorentz transformations. Participants outline the necessary steps, including transforming the variables and applying the chain rule for partial derivatives. A key point of confusion arises regarding the derivative of the transformed variables, particularly how to derive \(\frac{\partial x'}{\partial x}\) and \(\frac{\partial t'}{\partial t}\). Clarifications are provided on treating other variables as constants during differentiation, leading to a better understanding of the relationships between the transformed and original variables. Ultimately, the participants work through the algebra to confirm the invariance of the wave equation.
Antic_Hay
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the electromagnetic wave equation

\frac{\partial^{2}\phi}{\partial x^{2}} +<br /> \frac{\partial^{2}\phi}{\partial y^{2}} +<br /> \frac{\partial^{2}\phi}{\partial z^{2}} -<br /> \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^{2} \phi}{\partial t^2}

is invariant under a Lorentz transformation.

Homework Equations



Lorentz Transformations:

x&#039; = \frac{x - vt}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}

t&#039; = \frac{t - \frac{v}{c^2}x}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}

y&#039; = y

z&#039; = z

The Attempt at a Solution



Well I know exactly what I'm supposed to do here, transform the equations from x to x', y to y' etc. Then rearrange terms and show that the wave equation with x,y,z, and t is equal to the wave equation with x', y', z', and t'.

I understand the method is to get \frac{\partial x&#039;}{\partial x}, then use the chain rule ( \frac{\partial\phi}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial\phi}{\partial x&#039;}\frac{\partial x&#039;}{\partial x} ), and similarly for t -> t', then a bit of simple algebra and the answer should pop out the other end.

My only problem is that I have no idea what \frac{\partial x&#039;}{\partial x} is...in fact, I do know, since I have been told, that \frac{\partial x&#039;}{\partial x} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}, but I have no idea how that follows from the Lorentz transforms, could someone give me a hint in deriving it?

(My attempt was simply saying \partial x&#039; = \frac{\partial x - v\partial t&#039;}{1 - v^2/c^2}, but then dividing that by \partial x&#039; I'd get \frac{1 - \frac{\partial t&#039;}{\partial t}}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}, which isn't right...

As you can tell, I'm not really very comfortable with partial derivatives or differential calculus, so I'm probably doing something really silly in that derivation above...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Simply take the partial derivative of x' with respect to x. Same as taking a normal derivative of x' but treat all the variables except x as constants
 
Ah, that made sense, I knew it would be something trivial, I was just approaching it weirdly.

Great, have the answer now, thanks :)
 
OK, I thought I had the answer but this but it turns out I don't...

I want to calculate \frac{\partial t&#039;}{\partial t}

So I have t&#039; = \frac{t - \frac{vx}{c^2}}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}

The answer is supposedly \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}

I don't see how this would be...the bottom line is a constant term so looking at the top line alone,

\frac{\partial}{\partial t} t is obviously 1, fine, but I don't see how \frac{\partial}{\partial t} (-\frac{vx}{c^2}) = 0, surely x is a function of t, so we get

\frac{\partial}{\partial t} x = \frac{\partial x}{\partial t} = v so \frac{\partial}{\partial t} (t - vx/c^2) = 1 - v^2/c^2 for the derivative of the top line?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top