Show momentum is conserved in two different frames (relativity)

AI Thread Summary
Momentum is conserved in both the rest frame and a moving frame when analyzing a collision between two cars of different masses. The larger car (2000 kg) moving at 20 m/s collides with a stationary smaller car (1500 kg), resulting in a combined mass moving at a new velocity. Calculations show that the momentum equations yield the same final speed for both frames of reference, confirming conservation of momentum. The discussion emphasizes the importance of consistent notation and understanding the implications of momentum conservation across different frames. The problem is ultimately resolved, confirming the initial hypothesis.
Ravenatic20
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2000-kg car moving with a speed of 20 m/s collides with and sticks to a 1500-kg car at rest. Show that because momentum is conserved in the rest frame, momentum is also conserved in a reference frame moving with a speed of 10 m/s in the direction of the moving car.

Homework Equations


Not sure

The Attempt at a Solution


Let's have the larger (2000-kg) car be mass M, and the smaller (1500-kg) car to be mass m. Car M is traveling at speed v. After the collision, the two cars become one mass (M+m) and its velocity we will call v'.

To an observer on the ground...
mv + 0 = (M+m) v'
v' = MV/(M+m)

To an observer in a moving frame...
M is moving at speed V-v (towards the smaller car, m) and m is moving at speed -v (towards the larger vehicle, M). After the collision, (M+m) is moving at speed v'-v.
M(V-v) - mv = (M+m)(v'-v)
MV - Mv - mv + Mv + mv = (M+m)v'
v' = MV/(M+m)

These two equations are the same, meaning the final speed of the indecent is v' from any observer. Does this mean momentum is also conserved in a reference frame? If I'm on the right track, what good would it do plugging in numbers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re-read the question. You need to prove that conservation of momentum in the rest frame implies conservation of momentum in the moving frame. You're also not being consistent with your notation. The v in your first set of equations represents the speed of the bigger car, but in the second set of equations it represents the relative speed of the moving frame.
 
You're right. I ended up solving the problem. Thanks anyways.

Consider this problem solved.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top