Show that a function is increasing

[Parthalan]

Hi,

I'm in need of some help putting together this proof. I'm not sure if it's just harder than it looks, or I need to spend more time learning how to put them together.

Homework Statement

Show that f(x) = 9x^2 + 3x is strictly increasing on the interval (0, 10]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

I realize there are various arguments involving the turning point of a quadratic equation, but I don't think this is the type of answer that they're looking for.

Let u < v be two elements of the interval (0, 10]. Then from f(u) < f(v) we obtain:
9u^2 + 3u < 9v^2 + 3v,
9u^2 + 3u - 9v^2 + 3v < 0

From here, I think I need to get to u < v, but I can't see how to do it.

Thanks for any help.

 

[arildno]

What sign does f(v)-f(u) have?

 

[ziad1985]

One thing you can do is evaluate the first derivative of the function on that specified interval.
Do you know how can you interpret the sign of the derivative of a function over a specified interval on how the function itself is behaving on that interval?

 

[Parthalan]

The sign must be f(v) - f(u) > 0, otherwise f(v) < f(u).

Also, thanks for the suggestion about using the derivative, but I'm wondering if this can be done without.

Now for another go.

Let u < v be in the interval (0, 10]. Suppose that f(v) > f(u). Then:
f(v) - f(u) < 0
9v^2 + 3v - 9u^2 + 3u < 0
Which can only be true for u > v, hence, a contradiction.

Is that it, or did I miss a step?

Thanks for your help.

 

[Dick]

Your reasoning is circular. If you really want to show its increasing without derivatives show f(v)-f(u) is positive by factoring the expression for it. Hint: it's divisible by (v-u). Correct the sign on the 3u term first.

 

[jing]

Parthalan - read carfully what Dick is suggesting.

As an added hint start of your reasoning like this

Let u, v be two elelements in the interval (0,10] with u<v.

f(v)-f(u) = ...

and then as Dick says use the information you have to show this must be >0

 

[Parthalan]

I'm sure I have you all banging your head against a wall by now.

I got this far:

Let f(x) = 9x^2 + 3x and u, v \in (0, 10], where u &lt; v. If the function is strictly increasing, then f(u) &lt; f(v). From this, we determine:
f(v) - f(u) = (9v^2 + 3v) - (9u^2 + 3u)
= 9v^2 + 3v - 9u^2 - 3u
= (-3u + 3v)(1 + 3u + 3v)
= -3(u - v)(1 + 3u + 3v)
Since u &lt; v, then u - v must be negative. Since the product of two negatives is always a positive, and (1 + 3u + 3v) will also be positive, then f(v) - f(u) must be positive, and therefore, f(u) &lt; f(v).
QED.

Is that right, or am I still going in circles?

Many thanks to the people who have helped.

 

[Werg22]

Is it even necessary to write so much about this? If 0&lt; x_{1} &lt; x_{2}

3x_{1} &lt; 3x_{2}[/itex] and 9{x_{1}}^2 &amp;lt; 9{x_{2}}^2 . Therefore<br /> <br /> 9{x_{1}}^2 + 3x_{1} &amp;lt; 9{x_{2}}^2 + 3x_{2}. We&#039;re done here.

 

[Parthalan]

Thanks!

That was what I tried to do in the first place, but I forgot to factor it first, and ended up trying to show that it was increasing because the difference between f(x_2) and f(x_1) was positive. Changing the inequality directly seems to be the easier way (not as easy as using the derivative, but unfortunately, it's a course that comes before calculus).

 

[drpizza]

One thing you can do is evaluate the first derivative of the function on that specified interval.
Do you know how can you interpret the sign of the derivative of a function over a specified interval on how the function itself is behaving on that interval?

Don't forget, this is the pre-calculus section!