Show that an orthonormal(ON) sequence is also a ON-basis in a Hilbert Space

gothlev
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. Problem description
Let (e_n)_{n=1}^{\infty} be an orthonormal(ON) basis for H (Hilbert Space). Assume that (f_n)_{n=1}^{\infty} is an ON-sequence in H that satisfies \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} ||e_n-f_n|| < 1. Show that (f_n)_{n=1}^{\infty} is an ON-basis for H.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


Somehow if it can be shown that (f_n)_{n=1}^\infty is an complete ON-sequence it can be concluded that (f_n)_{n=1}^\infty is a ON-basis for H. I tried to make use of Parseval's formula and also expanding the sum \sum_{n=1}^\infty ||e_n-f_n|| < 1 with the rules for inner products, but it did not really get me anywhere. Since I can not really think of anything else I would need someone to point me in the right direction. I might be missing something really obvious, but can not really see it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know that (f_n) is an orthonormal sequence, so the only way it can fail to be an orthonormal basis is if the closed subspace V generated by (f_n) is not the entire space H. Think about how vectors in the orthogonal complement V^\perp = H \ominus V expand in terms of (e_n) and how that relates to the f_n.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top