Show that Euler-Mascheroni sequence is decreasing &monotonic

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Euler-Mascheroni sequence defined as tn=1+1/2+1/3+...+1/n - ln(n). Participants are tasked with interpreting the expression tn - tn+1 and demonstrating that it is greater than zero.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the interpretation of tn - tn+1 as a difference of areas and consider the implications of logarithmic properties. There are discussions about using integrals to support their reasoning, with some questioning the integration limits and the relationship between the logarithmic expressions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various approaches, including integration and area comparisons. Some have suggested methods while others are clarifying assumptions and exploring the implications of their findings. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive lines of inquiry are being pursued.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the extent of guidance provided. There is an ongoing examination of the assumptions related to the logarithmic functions and the integration process.

timnswede
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


tn=1+1/2+1/3+...+1/n - ln(n)
a.) Interpret tn - tn+1= [ln(n+1)-ln(n)] - 1/(n+1) as a difference of areas to show that tn - tn+1 > 0.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have not started working on part b) yet, because so far I am stuck on part a). I just simplified a bit and got ln(1+1/n)>1/(n+1). Not sure how to prove that the left side is bigger than the right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you consider an integral?
There are other methods, too, depending on the equations you got for the logarithm.
 
Is it as easy as just integrating both sides? I get xln(1+1/x)+ln(1+x)>ln(1+x). The left side is always greater since xln(1+1/x) is always greater than zero for n>1. Is that enough to prove it?
 
Integrate both sides with respect to what?

[ln(n+1)-ln(n)] looks like an integration result.
 
Woops those x's up there should be n's. But with dn. I can't see what integral would have resulted in [ln(n+1)-ln(n)] though. Integrating 1/n gets me ln(n), but integrating ln(n) does not get me ln(n+1).
 
timnswede said:
Integrating 1/n gets me ln(n)
If you integrate from where to where?
 
mfb said:
If you integrate from where to where?
From the beginning of the sequence, 1, to the end, n.
 
timnswede said:
From the beginning of the sequence, 1, to the end, n.
What if you integrate it from n to n+1?
Also can you think of the area of rectangle formed with height 1/(n+1) and width (n+1)-n? Just compare them on the graph of f(x)=1/x
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K