Show that expecting value of energy is independent of time

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the expectation value of energy is independent of time within the context of quantum mechanics. The original poster presents a scenario involving a Hamiltonian operator and a normalized wave function, seeking to understand the implications of time independence in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate the Hamiltonian to the expectation value of energy and considers differentiating with respect to time to show independence. Some participants question the correctness of the original poster's expressions and suggest clarifying assumptions about the potential involved. Others explore the implications of time-independent Hamiltonians and the structure of wave functions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into the nature of the Hamiltonian and its implications for the expectation value of energy. There is a recognition of the need to prove that the expectation value is independent of time, with some guidance provided on how to approach the problem through differentiation. However, there is no explicit consensus on the original poster's initial approach.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the assumptions regarding the potential being time-independent and the normalization of wave functions. The original poster also raises a related question about proving inequalities involving the ground state energy, indicating additional layers of complexity in the problem context.

emeriska
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Sorry I failed to make Latex work, don't know why...

1. Homework Statement

We consider
for a given potential. Psi is also normalized...

h%29%5Cpsi_%7Bn%7D%28x%29%24%24.gif

Homework Equations


Show that expectation value of energy is independent of time.

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I'm use to expecting values, but not of the energy...

I started with <H>psi=<E>psi
then if I compute <H>=<psi|H|psi> = E|Psi> = E

Then I told myself H=p^2/2m + V(x)

So I guess if I compute dH/dt and I find it equals to 0 I can say E is independent of time?

I feel like this is wrong tough... It looks too simple

Thanks a lot for checking that out guys!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to PF :-)
They aren't called expecting values, but expectation values...

<H>=<psi|H|psi> = E|Psi> = E
the thing in the middle doesn't look right . What exactly do you compute ?
 
Thanks about that!

Well, I'm really not quite sure...found that somewhere and I tought it made sens but the more I look at it the more this doesn't help at all...
 
Are you given that ##V=V(x)\neq V(x,t)## is true, so that your Hamiltonian is explicitly time-independent? Otherwise, I don't think the statement in this problem is true.

I'm guessing this is assumed because you have written:

$$\Psi(x,t)=\sum_n c_n(t=0)e^{-iE_n t/\hbar}\psi_n(x)$$

If so, all you have to prove is that ##\left<H\right>## is independent of time, since that IS the expectation value of the energy. In other words, prove:

$$\frac{d\left<H\right>}{dt}=0$$
 
If ##H## is independent of time, the wave functions ##\Psi({\bf r},t)## in ##i\hbar {\partial \Psi\over\partial t} = H\Psi ## can be written as ##f(t) \;\psi({\bf r})## and the equation can be re-written as ##i\hbar {\partial f \over\partial t} \psi({\bf r}) = f(t) \;H\psi (\bf r)## or $$i\hbar {\partial f \over\partial t} /f(t) = H\psi (\bf r)/\psi({\bf r})$$ Now left hand side is a function of t only, right hand of r only. Can only be if both sides are constant. name the constant E and you get the time-independent Schroedinger eqn ##H\psi ({\bf r}) = E\;\psi({\bf r})##.
For the complete wave function there still is the time part, for which ##i\hbar {\partial f \over\partial t} = E \; f(t)## with solution ## f(t) = e^{{-i E\over \hbar} t }##. That's where the ##\Psi(x,t)## in your exercise come from.

The full wording of your exercise probably says the ##\psi_n## are normalized ? And they satisfy ##H|\psi_n> = E_n|\psi_n>## ?

Now your <H>=<psi|H|psi> can be written out in full (by you) as $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\; \Psi^*(x,t) \; H \; \Psi^*(x,t) \; dx $$to give the expectation value of E. Fill in the given ##\Psi##, see that the exp (and hence the time dependence) disappears
 
I had to read that a couple times but thanks a lot! that really helped!
 
Oh, and while I'm there,

I also need to prove that ##<H> <= E_{1}##, where ##E_{1}## is the fundamental energy. How will I proceed to do that?

Do I need to compute ##E_{1}##? Cause if I do, I'll end up with terms in ##\psi_{1}## that I'm not quite sure how to compare with ##\psi_{n}##
 
I think you mean ##\left<H\right> \geq E_1## right? ##E_1## is the ground state energy, so you shouldn't be getting energies lower than it.
 
Yes sorry your right! I know it sound really obvious, but I need to prove it...That's what bugging me :S
 
  • #10
Well start with the definition: ##\left<H\right>=\left<\Psi|H|\Psi\right>## and then break down the ##\left|\Psi\right>## into the superposition of eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian to see how this will work out.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K