Show that f Uniform Differentiable implies f' Uniform Continuous

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of uniform differentiability of a function f defined on the interval (a,b) and its implications for the continuity of the derivative f'. The original poster is tasked with proving that if f is uniformly differentiable, then f' is continuous on (a,b).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of uniform differentiability and its relationship to the continuity of the derivative. Questions arise about the implications of uniform differentiability and the nature of continuity in the context of the derivative.

Discussion Status

Some participants are clarifying the distinction between continuity and uniform continuity of the derivative. There is an ongoing exploration of the definition of uniform differentiability and its consequences, with hints and examples provided to guide understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the specific requirements of the problem, particularly whether the goal is to show continuity or uniform continuity of the derivative. There is also mention of a specific example function that illustrates the difference between continuity and differentiability.

Aryth
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A function f:(a,b)\to R is said to be uniformly differentiable iff f is differentiable on (a,b) and for each \epsilon > 0, there is a \delta > 0 such that 0 < |x - y| < \delta and x,y \in (a,b) imply that \left|\frac{f(x) - f(y)}{x - y}-f'(x)\right| < \epsilon.

Prove that if f is uniformly differentiable on (a,b), then f' is continuous on (a,b).


The Attempt at a Solution



This is my first time being presented with the definition of uniform differentiability. I suppose that I am looking to show that the definition of uniform differentiability implies |f'(y) - f'(x)|< \epsilon... However, I'm having a hard time doing that. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's one thing to think about: What is it about uniform differentiability that would give you the continuity in f'? What does it mean to be continuous in f, but discontinuous in f'? A good example would be a function like f(x) = x^2\sin(1/x), x \neq 0, f(x) = 0, x = 0. This function is continuous everywhere but does not have a continuous derivative. Thus it is not uniformly differentiable. Why is that?
 
tjackson3 said:
Here's one thing to think about: What is it about uniform differentiability that would give you the continuity in f'? What does it mean to be continuous in f, but discontinuous in f'? A good example would be a function like f(x) = x^2\sin(1/x), x \neq 0, f(x) = 0, x = 0. This function is continuous everywhere but does not have a continuous derivative. Thus it is not uniformly differentiable. Why is that?

All that I have been given at this point is that if f is differentiabile at a point, then f is continuous at that point. So all I could say that it would make f uniformly continuous...

So, I guess if f is uniformly differentiable, then it has a derivative everywhere, and that should make f' be continuous everywhere.

Your explanation makes sense, but I guess I should be specific. I'm having trouble understanding the meaning of: \left|\frac{f(x) - f(y)}{x-y} - f'(x)\right| < \epsilon
 
I'm a bit confused...are we trying to show that f' is continuous or uniformly continous?
 
murmillo said:
I'm a bit confused...are we trying to show that f' is continuous or uniformly continous?

Just continuous I believe... I may have misstated the problem in the title. Apologies.
 
I don't think I've ever heard of uniformly differentiable before... but f(x)-f(y)/(x-y) is the slope of the line connecting f(x) and f(y). The inequality is saying that that slope gets arbitrarily close to the derivative of f at x. You might want to ask: how is that different from the definition of differentiable?

Here's a hint for the proof:
|f(y) - f(x)| = |f(y) - [f(y)-f(x)/(y-x)] + [f(x)-f(y)/(x-y)] - f(x)|
 
In the first slope you put (y-x) and in the next one you put (x-y)... Is that right?
 
Yes, but I'm actually adding and subtracting the same thing because I multiplied by -1 on the top and bottom.
 
Ok then, I see what you're doing. I did not notice that the f(x) and the f(y) were also switched.

That helped me finish it, thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K