MHB Show that G is isomorphic to G x G

  • Thread starter Thread starter oblixps
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating that the group of positive rational numbers under multiplication, G, is isomorphic to G x G. Participants suggest starting by expressing elements of G in terms of prime factorization, mapping them to the direct sum of infinitely many copies of the integers. This mapping leads to the conclusion that G is isomorphic to the direct sum, which is also isomorphic to itself when considering countably infinite copies. The distinction between direct sums and direct products is clarified, noting that the direct product of infinitely many integers is uncountable, while G remains countable. Ultimately, the conclusion is that both the direct sum and direct product of countably many copies of Z maintain isomorphism with themselves.
oblixps
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Let G be the group of positive rational numbers under multiplication. Show G is isomorphic to G x G.

i'm not sure how to start this. i am trying to come up with an explicit isomorphim but i can't seem to find one.

can someone give me some hints on how to approach this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oblixps said:
Let G be the group of positive rational numbers under multiplication. Show G is isomorphic to G x G.

i'm not sure how to start this. i am trying to come up with an explicit isomorphim but i can't seem to find one.

can someone give me some hints on how to approach this?
I think the easiest method would be to show that each of these groups is isomorphic to the direct sum of infinitely many copies of the integers.

To see that $G$ is isomorphic to $$\bigoplus_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\mathbb{Z}$$, notice that each element $g\in G$ can be uniquely expressed in the form $$g = \prod_{p\in\mathcal{P}}p^{g_p}$$, where $\mathcal{P}$ denotes the set of primes. Each $p\in\mathcal{P}$ is raised to an integer power, and all but finitely many of these powers are $0$. The map $g\mapsto (g_p)_{p\in\mathcal{P}}$ gives the required isomorphism.

If that seems a bit abstract, here's a concrete example. Suppose $g = \frac{63}{50}$. By factorising the numerator and denominator as products of primes, you see that $g = 2^{-1}3^25^{-2}7^111^013^0\ldots$. The map taking $g$ to $(-1,2,-2,1,0,0,\ldots)$ associates $g$ with an element of $$\bigoplus_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\mathbb{Z}$$.

It should be fairly obvious that if $$H = \bigoplus_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\mathbb{Z}$$ then $H$ is isomorphic to $H\times H$ (because "twice infinity is infinity"), and it follows that $G$ is isomorphic to $G\times G.$
 
i wouldn't have thought of taking the direct sum of infinitely many copies of Z. seems like an interesting example.

would the result also be true if we took an infinite direct product instead of direct sum?

thanks for your reply!
 
oblixps said:
would the result also be true if we took an infinite direct product instead of direct sum?
Direct product would not work here. The direct product of infinitely many copies of the integers is uncountable. So it could not be isomorphic to the group of positive rationals, which is countable.
 
ah i see. now forgetting about the group of rationals, if we just let G be the direct product of countably many copies of Z, we would also have G isomorphic to G x G right? it seems like it would be the same argument as in the case for a direct sum.
 
oblixps said:
ah i see. now forgetting about the group of rationals, if we just let G be the direct product of countably many copies of Z, we would also have G isomorphic to G x G right? it seems like it would be the same argument as in the case for a direct sum.
Yes, that's correct. In both cases, if you take countably many copies and then countably many more copies, you still have countably many copies.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
520
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
846
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
48
Views
4K