Show that G is isomorphic to G x G

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter oblixps
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The group of positive rational numbers under multiplication, denoted as G, is isomorphic to the direct sum of infinitely many copies of the integers, represented as $$\bigoplus_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\mathbb{Z}$$. Each element of G can be uniquely expressed as a product of primes raised to integer powers, allowing the mapping $$g\mapsto (g_p)_{p\in\mathcal{P}}$$ to establish the isomorphism. Consequently, G is also isomorphic to G x G, as the direct sum of countably infinite groups retains countability. The direct product of infinitely many copies of integers does not yield the same result due to uncountability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically isomorphisms.
  • Familiarity with the structure of the group of positive rational numbers under multiplication.
  • Knowledge of prime factorization and its application in group representation.
  • Basic comprehension of direct sums and direct products in the context of infinite groups.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of group isomorphisms in detail.
  • Explore the concept of direct sums and direct products in group theory.
  • Investigate the structure of countable vs. uncountable groups.
  • Learn about the role of prime factorization in algebraic structures.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in abstract algebra, students studying group theory, and anyone interested in the properties of rational numbers in mathematical structures.

oblixps
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Let G be the group of positive rational numbers under multiplication. Show G is isomorphic to G x G.

i'm not sure how to start this. i am trying to come up with an explicit isomorphim but i can't seem to find one.

can someone give me some hints on how to approach this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oblixps said:
Let G be the group of positive rational numbers under multiplication. Show G is isomorphic to G x G.

i'm not sure how to start this. i am trying to come up with an explicit isomorphim but i can't seem to find one.

can someone give me some hints on how to approach this?
I think the easiest method would be to show that each of these groups is isomorphic to the direct sum of infinitely many copies of the integers.

To see that $G$ is isomorphic to $$\bigoplus_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\mathbb{Z}$$, notice that each element $g\in G$ can be uniquely expressed in the form $$g = \prod_{p\in\mathcal{P}}p^{g_p}$$, where $\mathcal{P}$ denotes the set of primes. Each $p\in\mathcal{P}$ is raised to an integer power, and all but finitely many of these powers are $0$. The map $g\mapsto (g_p)_{p\in\mathcal{P}}$ gives the required isomorphism.

If that seems a bit abstract, here's a concrete example. Suppose $g = \frac{63}{50}$. By factorising the numerator and denominator as products of primes, you see that $g = 2^{-1}3^25^{-2}7^111^013^0\ldots$. The map taking $g$ to $(-1,2,-2,1,0,0,\ldots)$ associates $g$ with an element of $$\bigoplus_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\mathbb{Z}$$.

It should be fairly obvious that if $$H = \bigoplus_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\mathbb{Z}$$ then $H$ is isomorphic to $H\times H$ (because "twice infinity is infinity"), and it follows that $G$ is isomorphic to $G\times G.$
 
i wouldn't have thought of taking the direct sum of infinitely many copies of Z. seems like an interesting example.

would the result also be true if we took an infinite direct product instead of direct sum?

thanks for your reply!
 
oblixps said:
would the result also be true if we took an infinite direct product instead of direct sum?
Direct product would not work here. The direct product of infinitely many copies of the integers is uncountable. So it could not be isomorphic to the group of positive rationals, which is countable.
 
ah i see. now forgetting about the group of rationals, if we just let G be the direct product of countably many copies of Z, we would also have G isomorphic to G x G right? it seems like it would be the same argument as in the case for a direct sum.
 
oblixps said:
ah i see. now forgetting about the group of rationals, if we just let G be the direct product of countably many copies of Z, we would also have G isomorphic to G x G right? it seems like it would be the same argument as in the case for a direct sum.
Yes, that's correct. In both cases, if you take countably many copies and then countably many more copies, you still have countably many copies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
661
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
991
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
48
Views
5K