Show that kinetic energy of the earth after a collision can be ignored

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the kinetic energy of the Earth after an elastic collision with a ball can be ignored due to the Earth's significantly larger mass. The equations of motion are derived, specifically using conservation of linear momentum and kinetic energy. The key equations presented are: v’1 = (m1 - m2) / (m1 + m2) * v1 and v’2 = (2m1) / (m1 + m2) * v1. As the mass ratio of the ball to the Earth approaches zero, the kinetic energy imparted to the Earth becomes negligible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elastic collisions in physics
  • Familiarity with conservation laws: momentum and kinetic energy
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
  • Knowledge of mass ratios and their implications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Learn about conservation of momentum and energy in collisions
  • Explore the implications of mass ratios in physical systems
  • Investigate real-world applications of collision theory in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of collisions and their implications on massive bodies like the Earth.

questtosuccess
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Show that the kinetic energy of the Earth after a collision can be ignored (stuck & desperately need help)?
A ball of mass m2 is dropped and bounces off the floor. If the impact is viewed as an elastic collision between the ball and the earth, show that the kinetic energy of the Earth after the collision can be ignored.

Use equations:
v’1= (m1-m2/ m1+m2) v1
v’2= (2m1/m1+m2) v1

I don't even know where to begin... please help !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't quite follow what you're doing there, and it's really late where I am, so I'll just start you off the right way.

This problem basically hinges on the Earth being much more massive than the ball, so the ratio of the mass of the ball to that of the Earth is very close to zero.

Let's use some simpler symbols. Up is positive, down is negative. m is the mass of the ball, M is the mass of the earth. u is the initial speed of the ball, v is the final speed of the ball. The initial (vertical) speed of the Earth is zero, the final speed is w.

So ##-mu = mv - Mw## ---eqn 1

##\frac{1}{2}mu^2 = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}Mw^2## --eqn 2

The first eqn is conservation of linear momentum, second is conservation of K.E.

Rearrange eqn 1 to isolate w in terms of the other two variables, then put that in eqn 2. You should obtain an equation relating the ratio ##\displaystyle \frac{u}{v}## to an expression in terms of the ratio ##\displaystyle \frac{m}{M}##. When you let ##\displaystyle \frac{m}{M} \rightarrow 0##, what can you say about u and v?

Now consider what that means in terms of equation 2. Observe that the second term on the RHS represents the K.E. of the earth. Remember that the only kinetic energy here comes from the ball. If it bounces up with (almost) the same kinetic energy as it came down with, what can you say about the kinetic energy imparted to the Earth in the collision?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Everyone please remember to quote the entire OP in your response.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K