Show that linear transformation is surjective but not injective

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that a specific linear transformation T: M2x2(F) -> P2(F) is surjective but not injective. The scope includes theoretical exploration of linear transformations, vector spaces, and properties of mappings between them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Participants seek to show that the transformation T defined by T (a b c d) = (a-d) | (b-d)x | (c-d)x2 is surjective but not injective.
  • One participant questions the nature of the target space P2(F), asking if it is a 2x2 column vector.
  • Another participant suggests that to prove surjectivity, it is sufficient to find three matrices that map to the polynomials 1, x, and x2.
  • It is proposed that to demonstrate non-injectivity, one can find a non-zero matrix that maps to the zero polynomial.
  • Another approach mentioned involves noting the dimensions of the spaces involved, indicating that the dimension of the space of 2x2 matrices is three while that of second-order polynomials is two, implying that surjectivity leads to non-injectivity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods to approach the problem, but there is no consensus on a single method or resolution of the claims regarding surjectivity and injectivity.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully defined the assumptions regarding the spaces involved or the specific properties of the transformation, leaving some aspects of the discussion unresolved.

pearl0993
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

My question is to show that the linear transformation T: M2x2(F) -> P2(F) defined by

T (a b c d) = (a-d) | (b-d)x | (c-d)x2

is surjective but not injective.

thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pearl0993 said:
Hi,

My question is to show that the linear transformation T: M2x2(F) -> P2(F) defined by

T (a b c d) = (a-d) | (b-d)x | (c-d)x2

is surjective but not injective.

thanks in advance.

Hey pearl0993 and welcome to the forums.

What is the space of your answer (i.e. P2(F))? Is it a 2x2 column vector?

Also it would be helpful to show any working out or any ideas that you have for answering the questions.

Also if you are completely lost with these ideas, this web-page might help you get started:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bijection,_injection_and_surjection
 
i think what the intended mapping was (this is just an educated guess) is:

[a b]
[c d], maps to:

(a-d) + (b-d)x + (c-d)x2.

to prove surjectivity, it suffices to exhibit 3 matrices:

one whose image is 1, another whose image is x, and a 3rd whose image is x2.

to prove it is not injective, it suffices to exhibit a non-zero matrix that maps to the 0-polynomial.
 
another way to handle the problem is by noting that the space of 2x2 matrices is of dimension three and the space of up to second order polynomials is of dimension 2.

Then proving surjectivity in the way described by Devenoe automatically shows the map is not injective.

Since a linear bijection is an isomorphism of vector spaces and vector spaces that are isomorphic have to at least have equal dimension.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K