MHB Are the Roots of cx^2 + 2ax +b = 0 Real?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lytk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the roots of the quadratic equation cx^2 + 2ax + b = 0 are not real, given that a, b, and c are positive constants. Participants emphasize the importance of the discriminant, noting that for real roots, it must be greater than zero. They derive inequalities from the discriminants of two other quadratic equations, establishing that b^2 > ac and c^2 > ab. By multiplying these inequalities, they conclude that a^2 - bc < 0, indicating that the roots of cx^2 + 2ax + b = 0 are indeed not real. The conversation highlights the application of quadratic properties and inequalities in determining the nature of roots.
Lytk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
a, b , c are positive constants and the roots of ax^2 + 2bx+ c
and bx^2 + 2cx +a are all real and unequal(unique).
Show that the roots of cx^2 + 2ax +b = 0 are NOT real.

Help!:)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB, Lytk! :D

What does the discriminant of a quadratic function tell us about the nature of its roots?
 
Hi Lytk,

Please show what you've tried or what your thoughts are on this problem.
 
Hey :)
so the way to prove that the roots are not real, would be if the discriminant is less than 0.
I used the quadratic formula first to find the real roots of the first two equations:

The root of $ax^2 + 2bx +c$ =
$ \frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-ac}}{a}$ ( Real) ${b^2-ac}$ > 0

The root of $bx^2 + 2cx +a$ =

$$\frac{-c\pm\sqrt{c^2-ab}}{c} $$ (Real) ${c^2-ab}$ > 0The roots of $cx^2 + 2ax +b$ =
$$\frac{-a\pm\sqrt{a^2-bc}}{c} $$ IF ${b^2-ac}$ > 0
$b^2$ >ac

IF ${c^2-ab}$ > 0
$c^2$ >ab

Is there some way of proving
${a^2-bc}$ < 0
which would mean the roots are not real?
 
Lytk said:
Hey :)
so the way to prove that the roots are not real, would be if the discriminant is less than 0.
I used the quadratic formula first to find the real roots of the first two equations:

The root of $ax^2 + 2bx +c$ =
$ \frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-ac}}{a}$ ( Real) ${b^2-ac}$ > 0

The root of $bx^2 + 2cx +a$ =

$$\frac{-c\pm\sqrt{c^2-ab}}{c} $$ (Real) ${c^2-ab}$ > 0The roots of $cx^2 + 2ax +b$ =
$$\frac{-a\pm\sqrt{a^2-bc}}{c} $$ IF ${b^2-ac}$ > 0
$b^2$ >ac

IF ${c^2-ab}$ > 0
$c^2$ >ab

Is there some way of proving
${a^2-bc}$ < 0
which would mean the roots are not real?

You are almost there. :D

You have correctly found that we must have:

$$b^2>ac$$

$$c^2>ab$$

Now, if both sides of two inequalities are positive (and ours are since we are told $a,b,c>0$), then we can multiply the corresponding sides of the inequalities together, to get another valid inequality. So, what do we get when we multiply these 2 inequalities?
 
$b^2>ac$
$c^2>ab$

I multiply the corresponding sides and I get:
$b^2c^2>a^2cb$
which cancels down to
$bc>a^2$
$0>a^2 -bc$ (discriminant)

$\therefore$ Roots are not realTHANK YOU SO MUCH! This was confusing me for a long time :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top