MHB Show that the matrix D is invertible

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
To demonstrate that the matrix D is invertible if and only if D^TCD is positive definite, the discussion begins by exploring the implications of D^TCD being positive definite. If D is not invertible, there exists a non-zero vector x such that Dx = 0, leading to x^TD^TCDx = 0, contradicting the positive definiteness condition. Conversely, if D is invertible, then Dx = 0 implies x = 0, allowing for the conclusion that x^TD^TCDx > 0 for all non-zero x. The positive definiteness of C ensures that for any non-zero vector y, y^T C y > 0, further supporting the argument. The discussion concludes with a confirmation that the conditions are satisfied, affirming the relationship between the invertibility of D and the positive definiteness of D^TCD.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hi! :o

Given that $C \in \mathbb{R}^{n,n}$ is symmetric and positive definite and $D \in \mathbb{R}^{n,n}$.
I have to show that $D^TCD$ is positive definite $\Leftrightarrow $ $D$ is invertible.

For the direction $\Rightarrow $:
$D^TCD$ is positive definite, that means that $\forall x \in \mathbb{R}^n\setminus \{0\} :$ $ x^T D^TCD x >0$.
How can I continue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hi! :o

Given that $C \in \mathbb{R}^{n,n}$ is symmetric and positive definite and $D \in \mathbb{R}^{n,n}$.
I have to show that $D^TCD$ is positive definite $\Leftrightarrow $ $D$ is invertible.

For the direction $\Rightarrow $:
$D^TCD$ is positive definite, that means that $\forall x \in \mathbb{R}^n\setminus \{0\} :$ $ x^T D^TCD x >0$.
How can I continue?

Heya! ;)

Suppose $D$ is not invertible. Then there must be some $x$ for which $Dx = 0$...
 
I like Serena said:
Heya! ;)

Suppose $D$ is not invertible. Then there must be some $x$ for which $Dx = 0$...

So for some $x$ for which $Dx = 0$: $x^TD^TCDx=0$, but it should be $x^TD^TCDx>0$.
So $D$ must be invertible. Right?

For the direction $\Leftarrow $:
$D$ is invertible, so $Dx=0 \Rightarrow x=0$
To show that $D^TCD$ is positive definite, we have to show that $x^TD^TCDx>0$ $\forall x \in \mathbb{R}\setminus \{0\}$.
$\forall x \in \mathbb{R}\setminus \{0\}$ we have that $Dx \neq 0 \Rightarrow x^TD^TCDx \neq 0$. But how can we conclude that this is greater than $0$?
 
mathmari said:
So for some $x$ for which $Dx = 0$: $x^TD^TCDx=0$, but it should be $x^TD^TCDx>0$.
So $D$ must be invertible. Right?

Right! :cool:

For the direction $\Leftarrow $:
$D$ is invertible, so $Dx=0 \Rightarrow x=0$
To show that $D^TCD$ is positive definite, we have to show that $x^TD^TCDx>0$ $\forall x \in \mathbb{R}\setminus \{0\}$.
$\forall x \in \mathbb{R}\setminus \{0\}$ we have that $Dx \neq 0 \Rightarrow x^TD^TCDx \neq 0$. But how can we conclude that this is greater than $0$?

Well, it is given that $C$ is positive definite.
So for each $y \ne 0$ we have that $y^T C y > 0$.

Now suppose we set $Dx=y$...
 
I like Serena said:
Right! :cool:
Well, it is given that $C$ is positive definite.
So for each $y \ne 0$ we have that $y^T C y > 0$.

Now suppose we set $Dx=y$...

Great! Thank you very much! :o
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
935
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K