Show that this equation is homogeneous. PLEASE HELP, relatively simple

  • Thread starter Thread starter MisterOrange
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homogeneous
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around demonstrating the homogeneity of two equations: the energy-momentum relationship for a relativistic particle and the current in a wire. Participants point out a typo in the energy equation, noting it should include E squared for proper analysis. There are also concerns about unit conversions and algebraic errors in the attempts to show homogeneity. Clarifications are provided on the correct units for each variable, emphasizing the importance of consistency in dimensional analysis. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to convert all units appropriately before proceeding with the calculations.
MisterOrange
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

I have attempted two questions, see below.
1. The relationship between energy, E, and momentum, p, is E = P^2C^2 + M^2C^4 for a relativistic particle, Show that the equation is homogeneous

2. The current, I, in a wire is given by I = nAev where n is the number of electrons per unit volume, A is the cross sectional area of the wire, e is the charge on an electron and v is the drift velocity of the electrons. Show that the equation is homogeneous.




Homework Equations





3.My attempts in photo.

e0pbw1.jpg




I am assuming 16 is definitely wrong.

and for the questions, so you can see them more articulately.

2lcy60w.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
16 is definitely wrong.

I have since worked it.

I = A
n = m^-3
A = m^2
e = C = A*s
V = m*s^-1

which gives you A = m^2 * A * s * m * s^-1 * m^-3

Can anyone help with 17? I don't even know where to start...
 
Question 15 seems to have a typo. The correct expression for the relationship between energy and momentum should have the E squared: E2 = ...

So you definitely won't be able to demonstrate that the given equation is homogenous unless this typo is fixed.

However, for the work you've show on question 15 there are some algebra issues. Each term should reduce to units the same as for energy squared. In the fourth line of your solution you "lost" the square on the momentum when you substituted in the units for momentum.

For question 16 you've made the units of n to be C/m3, but it should be just m-3 as you wrote in your summary.
 
MisterOrange said:
16 is definitely wrong.

I have since worked it.

I = A
n = m^-3
A = m^2
e = C = A*s
V = m*s^-1

which gives you A = m^2 * A * s * m * s^-1 * m^-3

Can anyone help with 17? I don't even know where to start...

16 is ok. you're left with A = A .

17 is just using the same equation as 16. You'll have to convert all the length units to m^3 before you can use the equation, and then convert the speed you get to micrometer/s.
aC is an attocoulomb, which I've never seen used before.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top