Show wave kinetic energy and potential energy are the same

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating that the kinetic and potential energies of a traveling wave on a string are equal. Participants clarify that the relevant equations involve first-order partial derivatives, not second-order derivatives. The user outlines their approach to integrating the kinetic and potential energy expressions over one wavelength and seeks confirmation on their calculations. After performing the integrations, they successfully derive equal expressions for both energies, confirming the initial hypothesis. The conversation concludes with the user expressing satisfaction upon reaching the solution.
JayKo
Messages
127
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a traveling wave y=f(x-vt) on a string. Show that the kinetic and potential energies are always equal to each other. Remember that the potential energy of a wave on a string (over one wavelength) is given by

Homework Equations



E(potential)= 1/2 * F * \int (\partialy/\partialx)^2 dx
E(kinetic) = 1/2 * \mu * \int (\partialy/\partialt)^2 dx

F=\muv^2
ps:the integrand is integrate from 0 to lamba.
3. The Attempt at a Solution (\partial^{2}y/\partialt^{2})=-\omega^{2}A sin(\omegat-kx)

(\partial^{2}y/\partialx^{2})=-k^{2}A sin(\omegat-kx)

so my question is, is it i just need to integrate both the 2nd order partial derivative that i will be show that both potential and kinetic are the same? thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What work have you done on this problem so far?

Remember that you MUST show some work or thought on a problem before we can help you. We help people with homework problems. We do not do their homework for them.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=94379
 
hi G01, thanks for the prompt reply. i am typing my working now.
 
ok, just updated my question, hope some can answer my question.thanks :o

i m not asking for working, i just need clarification of my question. thanks.
 
JayKo said:

Homework Statement


Consider a traveling wave y=f(x-vt) on a string. Show that the kinetic and potential energies are always equal to each other. Remember that the potential energy of a wave on a string (over one wavelength) is given by

Homework Equations



E(potential)= 1/2 * F * \int (\partialy/\partialx)^2 dx
E(kinetic) = 1/2 * \mu * \int (\partialy/\partialt)^2 dx

F=\muv^2
ps:the integrand is integrate from 0 to lamba.
3. The Attempt at a Solution (\partial^{2}y/\partialt^{2})=-\omega^{2}A sin(\omegat-kx)

(\partial^{2}y/\partialx^{2})=-k^{2}A sin(\omegat-kx)

so my question is, is it i just need to integrate both the 2nd order partial derivative that i will be show that both potential and kinetic are the same? thanks.


Yes, your goal is to show that the potential energy integral and kinetic energy integral must be equal. Now, I just want to point out one possible error. In your relevant formulas for potential and kinetic energy, you have the expressions:

(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x})^2 and

(\frac{\partial y}{\partial t})^2

By these do you mean, "the second derivative" or "the first derivative squared?"
 
Last edited:
G01 said:
Yes, that is how I would go about this problem. Now, I just want to point out one possible error. In your relevant formulas for potential and kinetic energy, you have the expressions:

(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x})^2 and

(\frac{\partial y}{\partial t})^2

By these do you mean, "the second derivative" or "the first derivative squared?"

the question is written as (\frac{\partial y}{\partial x})^2 and

(\frac{\partial y}{\partial t})^2, actually that is my question, is first order partial derivative squared=second order partial derivative ?
 
Last edited:
JayKo said:
actually that is my question, is first partial derivative squared=second partial derivative ?

No, the two quantities are not generally equal to one another. So, you are going to want to work with first derivatives here and square them, since that is what each expression involves.
 
JayKo,

You seem to have a good idea of where you need to go with the problem at this point. I have to head out, but when I get home later I'll check back on this thread to see how you are doing. Try the calculations and see if you can show the equality. f you have any troubles post them, and I'll see if I can help later. Good Luck!
 
G01 said:
No, the two quantities are not generally equal to one another. So, you are going to want to work with first derivatives here and square them, since that is what each expression involves.
i see, got it now, in that case, i just substitute

(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x})^2=(k * A cos (omega*t-kx))^2

and the same for (\frac{\partial y}{\partial t})^2, with power of omega drop to 1. right? thanks
 
Last edited:
  • #10
G01 said:
JayKo,

You seem to have a good idea of where you need to go with the problem at this point. I have to head out, but when I get home later I'll check back on this thread to see how you are doing. Try the calculations and see if you can show the equality. f you have any troubles post them, and I'll see if I can help later. Good Luck!

Thanks G01, no problem. i guess we are of different time zone, here is 1:13 am 03 Feb 08.is time to go to bed. will work out this after wake up. thanks and appreciated your help. when you are free then check out my working here. thanks again.
 
  • #11
JayKo said:
i see, got it now, in that case, i just substitute

(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x})^2=(k * A cos (omega*t-kx))^2

and the same for (\frac{\partial y}{\partial t})^2, with power of omega drop to 1. right? thanks

Looks like you got the idea Jay. Good luck! If you have any more trouble feel free to ask.
 
  • #12
Hi G01, will show the working later. rushing with other assignment
 
  • #13
taking \partialy/\partialt=-\omegaA*cos(kx-\omegat)

\partialy/\partialx=kA*cos(kx-\omegat)

integrate from 0 to \lambda (\partialy/\partialt)^2=
\omega^{2}A^{2}\intcos^{2}(kx-\omegat)
=\omega^{2}A^{2}[x/2+(1/4(sin(2kx-2\omegat))]
=\omega^{2}A^{2}[\lambda/2+1/4(sin(2(2\pi\lambda/\lambda-2\omegat)+sin(2\omegat))]
=\omega^{2}A^{2}[\lambda/2+1/4(sin(4\pi-2\omegat)+sin(2\omegat))]
=\omega^{2}A^{2}[\lambda/2+1/4(-2\omegat)+sin(2\omegat))]
=\omega^{2}A^{2}[\lambda/2.
subst =\omega^{2}A^{2}[\lambda/2]. into

E(kinetic)
and get E = 1/4 *\mu \omega^{2}A^{2}[\lambda].do the same for E (potential)

integrate partial derivative of y/t from 0 to lamba will get k^{2}A^{2}[\lambda]/2

and subst it into E(potential) and subst F=\muv^2 to get 1/4 *\mu \omega^{2}A^{2}[\lambda][proved]oh boy oh boy, finally i got it. thanks G01 :D
 
Last edited:
Back
Top