1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Showing a linear operator is compact

  1. Apr 17, 2012 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    Let [itex][e_{j}:j\in N][/itex] be an orthonormal set in a Hilbert space H and [itex]\lambda_{k} \in R[/itex] with [itex]\lambda_{k} \rightarrow 0[/itex]

    Then show that [itex]Ax=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} \lambda_{j}(x,e_{j})e_{j}[/itex]

    Defines a compact self adjoint operator [itex]H \rightarrow H[/itex]


    3. The attempt at a solution

    I've proven that it's self adjoint by extending the orthonormal set to an orthonormal basis and taking an arbitrary y in H and taking the inner product of that y written as a summation using the basis with Ax and then comparing that with the inner product of x with Ay.

    To show that it's compact I need to consider some bounded sequence [itex]x_{n}[/itex] and show that [itex]Ax_{n}=\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\lambda_{j}(x_{n},e_{j})e_{j}[/itex] has some subsequence [itex]Ax_{n_{i}}[/itex] which is convergent.

    I'm not sure what direction to take here. Perhaps use the definition that A is compact if the image of the unit ball under A is sequentially compact? Or perhaps taking some the restriction of the sequence [itex]x_n[/itex] to some subset ([itex]Ax_{n}>0[/itex], or if that is empty, [itex]Ax_{n} \leq 0[/itex]) and using that [itex]\lambda_{k} \rightarrow 0[/itex] and x_{n} is bounded to show that this subsequence is cauchy and therefore convergent.

    I'm not confident with proving that linear operators are compact in general.
     
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted