Showing tha a random variable is a martingale

rickywaldron
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm having a bit of a problem proving the second condition for a martingale, the discrete time branching process Z(n)=X(n)/m^n, where m is the mean number of offspring per individual and X(n) is the size of the nth generation.

I have E[z(n)]=E[x(n)]/m^n=m^n/m^n (from definition E[X^n]=m^n) = 1
which is less than infinity, so first condition passes

Then I get lost with E[Z(n+1) given X(1),X(2)...X(n)]...any clues on how to show this is equal to Z(n)? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apparently E[X(n+1)|X(n)]=mX(n) as each individuum in the population has on the mean m offsprings.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top