Showing Two Functions Are Symmetric About A Line

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating the symmetry of the functions y_1 = (c/b) + d e^(-bx) and y_2 = (c/b) - d e^(-bx) about the line y = (c/d). A proposed method involves comparing distances from the functions to the line, but it is noted that the x-coordinate should not factor into the distance formula. An alternative, simpler method is hinted at, suggesting that visualizing the graphs of the functions may provide insight. Additionally, it is suggested that the sum of the two functions equals zero for all x, which could further indicate their symmetry. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying mathematical principles to prove symmetry.
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5
Hello everyone,

I have the functions y_1 = \frac{c}{b} + d e^{-bx} andy_2 = \frac{c}{b} - d e^{-bx}, where c \in \mathbb{R}, and b,d \in \mathbb{R}^+.
What I would like to know is how to show that these two functions are symmetric about the line y = \frac{c}{d}.

What I thought was that if y_1 and y_2 are symmetric about the line y = \frac{c}{d}, then the distance between y_1 and y, and the distance between y_2 and y, will be the same. That is, d_1 = \sqrt{(y_1 - y)^2 + (x - x_0)^2} and d_2 = \sqrt{(y_2 - y)^2 + (x - x_0)^2}, where d_1 = d_2.

Is this a correct way of determining symmetry? Is it true in general? Are there any other ways in which I could prove symmetry?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bashyboy said:
Hello everyone,

I have the functions y_1 = \frac{c}{b} + d e^{-bx} andy_2 = \frac{c}{b} - d e^{-bx}, where c \in \mathbb{R}, and b,d \in \mathbb{R}.
What I would like to know is how to show that these two functions are symmetric about the line y = \frac{c}{d}.

What I thought was that if y_1 and y_2 are symmetric about the line y = \frac{c}{d}, then the distance between y_1 and y, and the distance between y_2 and y, will be the same. That is, d_1 = \sqrt{(y_1 - y)^2 + (x - x_0)^2} and d_2 = \sqrt{(y_2 - y)^2 + (x - x_0)^2}, where d_1 = d_2.

Is this a correct way of determining symmetry? Is it true in general? Are there any other ways in which I could prove symmetry?

Some comments:

(1) Your distance formula should not involve x, because for each x separately you want to show that the distance between the points (x,c/b) and (x,y_1(x)) is the same as the distance between the points (x,c/b) and (x,y_2(x)). The x drops out of these distance formulas (although, of course, they still contain y_1(x) and y_2(x)). After that, what you say would be correct.

(2) There is a much easier way.
 
Last edited:
And what might this easier method be, Ray?
 
Bashyboy said:
And what might this easier method be, Ray?

That is for you to think about; I am not allowed to give solutions, nor would I want to. I can make one suggestion, however: think about what you would get if you drew graphs of the two functions on the same plot.
 
I have already drawn the plot of these functions, and that was how I made inference I made, that the distances must be the same. I am not sure what else could be concluded from the plots.
 
Would it perhaps be that the sum of the functions y1 and y2 is identically zero for all x, where is a real number?
 
Bashyboy said:
Would it perhaps be that the sum of the functions y1 and y2 is identically zero for all x, where is a real number?

Well, how would you write it after correcting your erroneous expressions given before?
 
Back
Top