Sign Issue with Zitelli Quantum Mechanics 3.6

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a sign issue in the equation dp/dt + ∇J(x,t) = 0, related to quantum mechanics, specifically within the context of a particle in an infinite potential well of length a. Participants are experiencing confusion regarding the equality and opposite nature of the two terms involved. They have verified their findings with multiple peers but continue to encounter discrepancies. Suggestions include using LaTeX for clarity and re-evaluating their work to identify potential mistakes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave functions.
  • Familiarity with the concept of probability current density vector.
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives in the context of physics.
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the probability current density vector in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn how to properly format equations using LaTeX for clarity in presentations.
  • Investigate common pitfalls in interpreting quantum mechanical equations.
  • Explore the implications of the infinite potential well model in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in quantum mechanics, physicists working with wave functions, and anyone involved in solving complex equations in theoretical physics.

katieranthony
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A particle of mass m, in an infinite potential well of length a, has the following initial wave function at t = 0:
Relevant Equations
probability current density vector and partial time derivative of p
I will include a photo. Essentially, we need to prove that dp/dt + the gradient of J(x,t) = 0.
We are getting that the two are instead equal and opposite, and have checked with multiple people.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
katieranthony said:
Homework Statement: A particle of mass m, in an infinite potential well of length a, has the following initial wave function at t = 0:
Relevant Equations: probability current density vector and partial time derivative of p

I will include a photo. Essentially, we need to prove that dp/dt + the gradient of J(x,t) = 0.
We are getting that the two are instead equal and opposite, and have checked with multiple people.
 
1707977324631.png
 
Here is our work. Please let us know if you have any suggestions! We are genuinely very curious.
 

Attachments

  • part2.jpg
    part2.jpg
    78.4 KB · Views: 86
  • part1.jpg
    part1.jpg
    74.6 KB · Views: 76
  • part3.jpg
    part3.jpg
    100 KB · Views: 84
katieranthony said:
Here is our work. Please let us know if you have any suggestions! We are genuinely very curious.
Your work in the photo is illegible. It would be best if you used LaTeX. When you do so, maybe you will resolve the negative sign problem. It's probably some silly mistake that you keep repeating because you are convinced that it's correct (it has happened to me too). Start fresh and don't copy from the board.
 
katieranthony said:
Homework Statement: A particle of mass m, in an infinite potential well of length a, has the following initial wave function at t = 0:
Relevant Equations: probability current density vector and partial time derivative of p

We are getting that the two are instead equal and opposite, and have checked with multiple people.
What two things are equal and opposite?? If ##x_1## and##~x_2## are equal and opposite , don't they sum to zero?? I am confused.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K